Subject says it all. I want to place some tag into flash and than compare it with the data in my SRAM. I know that it is simple but it is hard to start. Please advise. Thanks.
I have an old version of this RTX_Blinky. I did some tests.
Modified Blinky.c =>
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Task 6 'lcd': LCD Control task *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ __task void lcd (void) { const unsigned char hello[] = "Hello"; for (;;) { os_mut_wait(mut_GLCD, 0xffff); GLCD_SetBackColor(Blue); /* Set the Text Color */ GLCD_SetTextColor(White); /* Set the Text Color */ GLCD_DisplayString(0, 0, " MCB1700 RL-ARM "); GLCD_DisplayString(1, 0, " RTX Blinky "); GLCD_DisplayString(2, 0, " http://www.keil.com "); GLCD_DisplayString(2, 0, hello); os_mut_release(mut_GLCD); os_dly_wait (400); os_mut_wait(mut_GLCD, 0xffff); GLCD_SetBackColor(Blue); /* Set the Text Color */ GLCD_SetTextColor(Red); /* Set the Text Color */ GLCD_DisplayString(0, 0, " MCB1700 RL-ARM "); GLCD_DisplayString(1, 0, " RTX Blinky "); GLCD_DisplayString(2, 0, " http://www.keil.com "); os_mut_release(mut_GLCD); os_dly_wait (400); } }
KEIL toolchain says: -> Blinky.c(142): error: #167: argument of type "const unsigned char *" is incompatible with -> parameter of type "unsigned char *"
Modified Blinky.c, added a casting =>
__task void lcd (void) { const unsigned char hello[] = "Hello"; for (;;) { os_mut_wait(mut_GLCD, 0xffff); GLCD_SetBackColor(Blue); /* Set the Text Color */ GLCD_SetTextColor(White); /* Set the Text Color */ GLCD_DisplayString(0, 0, " MCB1700 RL-ARM "); GLCD_DisplayString(1, 0, " RTX Blinky "); GLCD_DisplayString(2, 0, " http://www.keil.com "); GLCD_DisplayString(2, 0, (unsigned char *)hello); os_mut_release(mut_GLCD); os_dly_wait (400);
KEIL toolchain says: -> ".\Obj\Blinky.axf" - 0 Error(s), 0 Warning(s).
-- I have learnt a lot from Per Westermark's articles. His articles are very detailed and well organized. I can understand that, some people just don't like/need so much details. But, to me, those are very valuable information. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Per Westermark again.
If one would ask: “What is the weather forecast for today?" And another one would provide extended "answer" including historical data and definitions of units and bunch of other very helpful and useful information; I won't consider this imaginary conversation as a question and answer. When the question about the weather has been asked the other person should probably at least ask: “Weather where?" Without this tiny detail the OP question could not be answered. That is actually all my point. Thank you for listening :)