C code to send AT comand and receive OK

So, again, you just sit there and be defeatist?

Nope. I aim to point ot the irrelevance of your actions.

Do you not have a positive suggestion?

Yes, don't waste forum space with unnecessary chatter that the hoped intended would read. Instead stick to relevance. Present diversion not included.

As I said, those who can't won't and those who can already have.

Go on, ummed singh - prove him wrong...?

How long does it take to read the text of your link and show appreciation? (I would not now be surprised to see a forged post follow).

... is it not worth scattering the side in the hope that some of it will fall on good ground and yield 30, 60, or even 100 fold...?

Judging by how much you (feel the need to) post the links to the FAQ, the figure is way less than even 30.

So, again, you just sit there and be defeatist?

Nope. I aim to point ot the irrelevance of your actions.

Do you not have a positive suggestion?

Yes, don't waste forum space with unnecessary chatter that the hoped intended would read. Instead stick to relevance. Present diversion not included.

As I said, those who can't won't and those who can already have.

Go on, ummed singh - prove him wrong...?

How long does it take to read the text of your link and show appreciation? (I would not now be surprised to see a forged post follow).

... is it not worth scattering the side in the hope that some of it will fall on good ground and yield 30, 60, or even 100 fold...?

Judging by how much you (feel the need to) post the links to the FAQ, the figure is way less than even 30.

So, again, you just sit there and be defeatist?

Nope. I aim to point ot the irrelevance of your actions.

Which is you being defeatist. So you've just contradicted yourself from one sentence to the next. You'll have to excuse us for not awarding much credibility to your other statements, then.

I still say it's better to at least give them the opportunity to learn something, rather than just be defeatist and assume they won't.

Which is you being defeatist. So you've just contradicted yourself from one sentence to the next. You'll have to excuse us for not awarding much credibility to your other statements, then.

Well, in your case, defeatism is the best course of action. There is no point in wasting a cogent argument on those who ... there's no point in even continuing with you. Ignore mode enabled. Good bye.

He has now posted in a more appropriate forum:

e2e.ti.com/.../225854.aspx

Promising. But are you suggesting that he posted there as a result of the reading of the FAQ? The times of your posting regarding the FAQ and his initial posting on the TI forum indicate something else to me.

And if you think there is hope everywhere, be careful: the person that the barren referred to is without doubt the exceptiolon that proves the rule.

In The Times today:

"People say you can take a horse to water but you can't make it drink. That's true, but if you don't take the horse to water in the first place they're never going to drink."

I'm such a doofus!

s/exceptiolon/exception/

Who can say?

"times of your posting regarding the FAQ and his initial posting on the TI forum indicate something else to me"

Are you sure the times use the same timezone?

I think he had not reposted until after my post. Even if I'm right, of course, that doesn't tell us whether he read the FAQ or not.

"if you think there is hope everywhere, be careful"

There is hope. It may or may not be fulfilled...

Are you sure the times use the same timezone?

I did wonder that myself. But it would be nice to think that someone who saw an epiphany would be a little bit quicker in showing appreciation.

What the headmaster of Eton said is predictable. But I, having been a member of the public school system, certainly saw the more realistic approach!

Hope you enjoy the rest of the weekend.