This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

software quality - what do you use

just curious folks to what folk use to help develope their software with.

I am an avid user of lint and having a go at trying to design what i am gonna do before i start being a code monkey but would like to find out what others are using.

Recently downloaded Tessy but as i get the feeling trying to apply it to an exsisting project will be a huge project its self and as the vendors havent been rushing to reveal the price cost may be an issue.

Does anybody have any recomendations on tools they find useful?

Parents
  • something does not match

    the article I linked to above refer to the FDA reviewing (with a tool) source code of medical devices.

    To make matters worse, she found that the FDA does not review or have access to the source code. She also found that she had no legal recourse against the manufacturer to force them to release their code.

    when and where releasing source code for public scrutiny should be mandated by law.

    I am all for requiring the FDA to be (qualified at and) forced to review source code. I am, however totally against anyone else having access.

    There has been enough good producers that have lost out to oriental copycats, let us not make it easier for the copycats,.

    yah, yah, yah the FDA might, if the chineese sought approval, see it was a knockoff, but the FDA is not "copyright police". Also, I would not have a (technical) problem if tasked with redoing a code to make it unrecognizable, I would, however refuse for ethical reasons.

    Erik

Reply
  • something does not match

    the article I linked to above refer to the FDA reviewing (with a tool) source code of medical devices.

    To make matters worse, she found that the FDA does not review or have access to the source code. She also found that she had no legal recourse against the manufacturer to force them to release their code.

    when and where releasing source code for public scrutiny should be mandated by law.

    I am all for requiring the FDA to be (qualified at and) forced to review source code. I am, however totally against anyone else having access.

    There has been enough good producers that have lost out to oriental copycats, let us not make it easier for the copycats,.

    yah, yah, yah the FDA might, if the chineese sought approval, see it was a knockoff, but the FDA is not "copyright police". Also, I would not have a (technical) problem if tasked with redoing a code to make it unrecognizable, I would, however refuse for ethical reasons.

    Erik

Children
No data