Hello,
Keil support did not reply yet - but am I correct in assuming that RL-ARM is now a part of MDK, and that each user needs to have a RL-ARM license paid for separately in order to be able to use FlashFS/TCPNet etc. (many samples in MDK 4.20 are broken, but the one that I did manage to compile failed to link complaining that my license is insufficient - that did not happen with MDK 4.14 !) ? If so, this is a HUGE expense. If my boss asks for my opinion (and I think he will) - we're going open source!
Per,
You posted:
'Keil, a "get an arm and a leg" company'
I would comfortably say: "Keil, a "get a brain company" ! I like their tools. There are great - sure.
But Keil/ARM marketing please read this: WE CANNOT PAY 8000 EUROS PER SEAT. WE CANNOT. THERE IS NO MONEY - DO YOU UNDERSTAND=? THERE IS NO MONEY FOR THIS! For god's safe, we can emply a freelancer to upgrade open source code for that money! In the mean time, I have uIP and probably also FatFS to replace TCPNet and FlashFS.
Keil - you guys are geniuses. I kid you not.
"'Keil, a "get an arm and a leg" company'
I would comfortably say: "Keil, a "get a brain company" !"
It's a "Get an arm and a leg from each of our customers" company.