This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

is this why the RTOS 'need' is so prevalent

I just realized that when wait I/O is all over the place using a RTOS is a feasible workaround. Even the 'C' library is wait I/O ARGH. Is it the average coders inability to make no_wait_I/O that is the reason that so many state "I need a RTOS" ?

Erik

Cross-posted at 8052.com

Parents

0 doubt that my ISP Al Bradford over 14 years ago in reply to Neil Kurzman

I just re-read my last post.

RTX ran on the MIR in less than 600 bytes total program.

That's plainly false. Not intentional, just dumb on my part. I meant to say the RTOS and communications ran in less than 600 bytes. The actual display code in several threads was a bit larger. Sorry about my mistake.
Bradford
Cancel
Vote up 0 Vote down

Cancel

Reply

0 doubt that my ISP Al Bradford over 14 years ago in reply to Neil Kurzman

I just re-read my last post.

RTX ran on the MIR in less than 600 bytes total program.

That's plainly false. Not intentional, just dumb on my part. I meant to say the RTOS and communications ran in less than 600 bytes. The actual display code in several threads was a bit larger. Sorry about my mistake.
Bradford
Cancel
Vote up 0 Vote down

Cancel

Children

No data