This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Build my own LCD cube

Hi fellow hobby freeks.

I need to make an LCD cube with 100x100x100 LCDS' and I know that a KEIL CX51 is the best processor for the project.

BUT how can I wire the LCDS' to the processor.

Parents
  • This is more of a FPGA project (at least if you wish to handle DVI/HDMI signals).
    I've seen the 3d cube displays, even a full color one. There resolution is kind of bad (high granularity).

    I am not positive but ... an LCD variant just wouldn't work due to the LCD's obscuring each other.

    Maybe the person was thinking 100x100x100 LED's? (why 100 and not 128 or some binary number? sigh)?

    As I was saying it looks to be something doable with an FPGA and a pile of driver chips too me.

    You could construct your video data in layers and use the HDMI signal to send the 3d data in layers (480p is what 856X480x60 24.65mps?), which the FPGA can split up and display as surfaces in the 3d matrix. do able but I am not sure how good it would look. I believe one needs just the surface illumination and not all the layers between in terms of the 3d data. Hmmm interesting problem.

    So what is with the trolling? Are people so bored they like to create problems? Life is way to short to be that bored.

    Stephen

Reply
  • This is more of a FPGA project (at least if you wish to handle DVI/HDMI signals).
    I've seen the 3d cube displays, even a full color one. There resolution is kind of bad (high granularity).

    I am not positive but ... an LCD variant just wouldn't work due to the LCD's obscuring each other.

    Maybe the person was thinking 100x100x100 LED's? (why 100 and not 128 or some binary number? sigh)?

    As I was saying it looks to be something doable with an FPGA and a pile of driver chips too me.

    You could construct your video data in layers and use the HDMI signal to send the 3d data in layers (480p is what 856X480x60 24.65mps?), which the FPGA can split up and display as surfaces in the 3d matrix. do able but I am not sure how good it would look. I believe one needs just the surface illumination and not all the layers between in terms of the 3d data. Hmmm interesting problem.

    So what is with the trolling? Are people so bored they like to create problems? Life is way to short to be that bored.

    Stephen

Children