• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 2043 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

STM32 shared interrupt vector

Dave E

Hi all,

in writting my orginal question, I found part of the anwser I was asking so what follows is the second part!

I need to do something similar to the following link relating to a C167 but on the STM32:
http://www.keil.com/support/docs/1075.htm

Could someone point me in the right direction (pun intended).

TIA, Dave

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Andy Neil

    Thanks Andy, I had seen NIC_SetVectorTable but perhaps not fully assimilated it.

    In the boot loader I call

    SetVectorTable(NVIC_VectTab_FLASH,0);

    To call the user application:
    The bootloader jumps to the application base address, effectively its reset vector.

    SetVectorTable(NVIC_VectTab_FLASH, app_base_address - NVIC_VectTab_FLASH);

    (making sure the base address is on a 1k boundary)

    Is my thinking along the right lines?

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Andy Neil

    Thanks Andy, I had seen NIC_SetVectorTable but perhaps not fully assimilated it.

    In the boot loader I call

    SetVectorTable(NVIC_VectTab_FLASH,0);

    To call the user application:
    The bootloader jumps to the application base address, effectively its reset vector.

    SetVectorTable(NVIC_VectTab_FLASH, app_base_address - NVIC_VectTab_FLASH);

    (making sure the base address is on a 1k boundary)

    Is my thinking along the right lines?

Children
No data