Please note: We are aware of an issue affecting replies on the Arm Community forums, which may not be loading as expected.

We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience while we investigate and work to resolve the issue.

Thank you for your understanding.


This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

ARMCC and 64-bit unsigned integers...?

There's a knowledgebase article that was last reviewed on June 7, 2005 that says the CARM compiler does not support 64-bit unsigned integers. I'm using the ARMCC compiler (from the RealView MDK-ARM toolchain), and the following code

char s[100];
unsigned int x32;
unsigned long int x64;

sprintf(s,"sizeof(x32)=%u\r\n",sizeof(x32));
printf(s);
sprintf(s,"sizeof(x64)=%u\r\n",sizeof(x64));
printf(s);

produces the following output

sizeof(x32)=4
sizeof(x64)=4

This leads me to believe that the ARMCC tools don't support 64-bit math either.

However, if that's so, why doesn't the above code create any errors or warnings when it's compiled?

Is there a way to get 64-bit unsigned integer support in these tools?

Parents
  • That was what C51 used to do - and the trouble with that was that it couldn't (or just didn't?) give context-sensitive help from within the IDE.

    But now the ARM tools don't even do the context-senstive help anymore - so they might as well use PDF!

    (and ARM is one of the few companies that does enable annotations on its PDFs)

Reply
  • That was what C51 used to do - and the trouble with that was that it couldn't (or just didn't?) give context-sensitive help from within the IDE.

    But now the ARM tools don't even do the context-senstive help anymore - so they might as well use PDF!

    (and ARM is one of the few companies that does enable annotations on its PDFs)

Children