This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Compiling differences between C51 v7.03 and v8.06

Hello!

I have uVision that compiles fine with the C51 v7.03 compiler and the related package, but not complete with the 8.06. I used two different Keil installations. All files are in the same folder.

In the 8.06 I get linker errors like "object does not fit in to pdata page" and "0080H". This looks like the compiler was thinking the PDATA was only 128 bytes, but it is set to 256 bytes in the startup.a51. Any clue what's different in the newer Keil package?

Also there is a warning in 8.06 (which does not show in 7.03) "converting non-pointer to pointer" on this

ptr_xdata = sPtr_obj->Adresse;


while the vars are set like this:

uchar uc_set_obj( uchar pdata *ptr_Set)
{
   uchar i;
   uchar xdata *ptr_xdata;
   struct stOBJADR code *sPtr_obj;

   sPtr_obj=&Obj[*ptr_Set];
   .
   .
   .
   ptr_xdata = sPtr_obj->Adresse;
}


The struct stOBJADR has a member "uint Adresse;"

I can see no wrong use of the pointers. I just want to be sure that the warning does not affect the code to not work correctly.

Parents
  • "The address of a pointer is the pointer itself."

    No: The address of the pointer is the location of the pointer itself.

    "So how do you call the address the pointer points to in your terminology?"

    That is the value of the pointer.

    "I just call it pointer address"

    Don't call it that - it's just confusing!

    "Still because I don't need to care where (at which address) the pointer itself is located"

    You would care if you needed a pointer to the pointer...

Reply
  • "The address of a pointer is the pointer itself."

    No: The address of the pointer is the location of the pointer itself.

    "So how do you call the address the pointer points to in your terminology?"

    That is the value of the pointer.

    "I just call it pointer address"

    Don't call it that - it's just confusing!

    "Still because I don't need to care where (at which address) the pointer itself is located"

    You would care if you needed a pointer to the pointer...

Children
No data