• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 44 replies
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 15173 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

this is non portable code ?

safron sperl 


unsigned char buf[100]
.
.
.
unsigned int val;
.
.
.
val = *((unsigned int *)(&buf[1]));
.
.
.

comments?

Parents
  • 0 in reply to ImPer Westermark

    Too thick fingers, or to dim mind...

    "your expr3 side effects will always - for any C/C++ compiler - result in expr3 side effects (the loop variable being updated) until expr2 doesn't allow any furter iterations."

    Should say
    "your expr3 evaluations will always - for any C/C++ compiler - result in expr3 side effects (the loop variable being updated) until expr2 doesn't allow any furter iterations."

Reply
  • 0 in reply to ImPer Westermark

    Too thick fingers, or to dim mind...

    "your expr3 side effects will always - for any C/C++ compiler - result in expr3 side effects (the loop variable being updated) until expr2 doesn't allow any furter iterations."

    Should say
    "your expr3 evaluations will always - for any C/C++ compiler - result in expr3 side effects (the loop variable being updated) until expr2 doesn't allow any furter iterations."

Children
No data