eeprom

Per,

I would not argue with your content of the comment - Putting in the 'why' is far more important that repeating the obvious.

But if, for example, there is a line of code:

StartTx();  // Check for completion

I do find that on skimming over the code, I notice such obvious discrepancies.

Per,

I would not argue with your content of the comment - Putting in the 'why' is far more important that repeating the obvious.

But if, for example, there is a line of code:

StartTx();  // Check for completion

I do find that on skimming over the code, I notice such obvious discrepancies.

i recall 'comments' from the assembler days such as
push acc ; save accumulator on stack
which, of course do not even deserve the name 'comment'.
however
push AR3 ; beware, the use of r3 is buried deep, do not remove
might have a purpose

I totally agree with the statement that why is the important thing to comment, However, as far as what there are cases:
// ........
// ........
// ........
// exit false if overlow occur

U1 DoSomeMathFunction(U8 Tom, U16 ***, U8 Harry)

i would hate to go through lots of lines of code to see what the exit flag signified.

Erik

I wanna know the difference between the follwing...

Linear Hall-Effect Sensors

Unipolar Hall-Effect Digital Switches

Omnipolar Hall-Effect Digital Switches

Bipolar Hall-Effect Digital Switches

Hall-Effect Digital Latches

First of all, you wrote a statement - was it inteded to be a question?

The functioning of different sensors isn't directly related to the Keil tools. Don't you think a hardware-orientthe inner workings of electronic components?ed forum might be a better choice when wondering about?

Besides, what does the sensors has to do with the use of EEPROM memories?