May I spceify all of functions are reentrant by directives?

It is enough that just a couple of functions are not called from multiple threads or recursively for the compiler to be able to find call trees that it can optimize the parameter passing for.

Are you saying that every function in your application is called from multiple threads? That most definitely sounds like you should take a closer look at your design!

Your goal, when developing for '51 processors is to minimize the number of reentrant functions, not find easier way to declare every function reentrant. This is just as productive as asking how you can have the compiler upgrade every integer to 32-bit or maybe 64-bit, or how you can get the compiler to evaluate every single expression as floating point, or how you can get the compiler to treat every single variable as volatile without using the volatile keyword.

Are you really, really sure that you have made a good split of your logic into separate tasks? From your description, it sounds more like all takss are doing basically the same thing, in which case all tasks will make use of the same set of functions.

It is enough that just a couple of functions are not called from multiple threads or recursively for the compiler to be able to find call trees that it can optimize the parameter passing for.

Are you saying that every function in your application is called from multiple threads? That most definitely sounds like you should take a closer look at your design!

Your goal, when developing for '51 processors is to minimize the number of reentrant functions, not find easier way to declare every function reentrant. This is just as productive as asking how you can have the compiler upgrade every integer to 32-bit or maybe 64-bit, or how you can get the compiler to evaluate every single expression as floating point, or how you can get the compiler to treat every single variable as volatile without using the volatile keyword.

Are you really, really sure that you have made a good split of your logic into separate tasks? From your description, it sounds more like all takss are doing basically the same thing, in which case all tasks will make use of the same set of functions.

Hi Sir,
I do really understand a reentrant function can slow down the executing performance and I am keeping functions from being that.
But the tasks are not simply doing the same thing, but depend on the arguments (structure pointer) doing difference things. Each task does long-winde processes and the code are big engouh to make me decide not to create the same function for each task.

Can we just set compiler not to use fixed memory address to put locals or arguments but use reentrant stack (or similar method) as default?

Sounds like the 8051 is basically the wrong choice for this project?

Is it too late to reconsider?

The full list of available directives is here:
http://www.keil.com/support/man/docs/c51/c51_cm_directives.htm

Hi Andy,

Thank you for your notice.

I have checked the URL and the listed directive seems cannot support my requirement.

Thanks & Regards.