Hi all, I'm new to C and need a hint on an optimization problem. I have a 16 bit counter, divided into two 8bit SFRs, let's say TH0 and TL0, and I want to transfer them to a short. I could: mshort = (short)TH0 * 256 + TL0 but this takes 16bytes, similar to something like: mshort = (short)TH0 << 8 + TL0 I would like to do it more simple, like: MSB of mshort = TH0 LSB of mshort = TL0 I tried it that way: unsigned short *pINT; pINT = &TH0; but this is not possible with SFRs. Something else I tried: unsigned short mINT; unsigned char *pChar; pChar = & mINT; *pChar = TH0; *(pChar + 1) = TL0; results in even more code (31 bytes) So I think it would be the easiest, if I could place 2 char variables at the same address, covered by my short, like: unsigned short mINT; unsigned char mChar[2] (at the same address like mINT) mChar[0] = TH0; mchar[1] = TL0; but I don't know, how to place the mChar array at the same address of mINT. I tried it with: unsigned char mChar[2] _at_ mINT; but this is not possible (compiler error). So anyone here, who could give me a hint how to place both variables at the same address? Thanks in advance Marco Della Rocca
Bad idea. Never define your own SFRs. That's what you get ready-made headers from Keil for. I always do. The names, as they are, are not searchable, e.g. if you search on 'EA' you may miss IOR IE,080h. staying with the above example, my names are sfr SF_IE = 0xa8; sbit SB_IE_EA = 0x8f; #define SM_IE_EA 0x80 When you get to the derivatives with 'paged' SFRs such as SILabs f12x, it get even better. then I have SG_... //any sfrpage S0_... //SFRpage 0... Erik