• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 967 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I\O Speed Problem

Siddharth Vaidya

Hi,

I am using my LPC2364 at 75Mhz and i am getting maximum i|O frequency upto 13MHz only. Even if i toggle just one bit.

I want upto 16MHz minimum frequency of I\O. Can i do it with Thumb instructions or 13Mhz is the max??

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Suvidh Kankariya

    Hi Suvidh,

    I have also tried to run my LPC2364 at 72MHz but still I am not getting 16MHz. I tried the maximum speed that it can work upto. I could go upto 75MHz max. After that my LPC2364 stoped working.

    As per you have written i should get
    72MHz/4 Cycles(2 cycle for on + 2 cycles for off)=18MHz
    but i am not getting it?

    I am using a realview Keil IDE 3.03a. My code is as under

    while(1)
    { FIO2PINL=0x0001; FIO2PINL=0x0002; FIO2PINL=0x0003; FIO2PINL=0x0004; FIO2PINL=0x0005; FIO2PINL=0x0006; FIO2PINL=0x0007; FIO2PINL=0x0008; FIO2PINL=0x0009; FIO2PINL=0x000A; FIO2PINL=0x000B; FIO2PINL=0x000C; FIO2PINL=0x000D;
    .... and the sequence follows
    }

    In this way i should get I\O at 18MHz at P2.0
    But i am getting only 13MHz.

    Is it the problem of my compiler?? Should i go to assembly or thumb mode to reduce time??

    i have also tried with the statements in assembly as

    __asm (mov FIO2PINL,0x0001)

    it gives the same output.

    Can you figure out the problem?? Please help it is argent.

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Suvidh Kankariya

    Hi Suvidh,

    I have also tried to run my LPC2364 at 72MHz but still I am not getting 16MHz. I tried the maximum speed that it can work upto. I could go upto 75MHz max. After that my LPC2364 stoped working.

    As per you have written i should get
    72MHz/4 Cycles(2 cycle for on + 2 cycles for off)=18MHz
    but i am not getting it?

    I am using a realview Keil IDE 3.03a. My code is as under

    while(1)
    { FIO2PINL=0x0001; FIO2PINL=0x0002; FIO2PINL=0x0003; FIO2PINL=0x0004; FIO2PINL=0x0005; FIO2PINL=0x0006; FIO2PINL=0x0007; FIO2PINL=0x0008; FIO2PINL=0x0009; FIO2PINL=0x000A; FIO2PINL=0x000B; FIO2PINL=0x000C; FIO2PINL=0x000D;
    .... and the sequence follows
    }

    In this way i should get I\O at 18MHz at P2.0
    But i am getting only 13MHz.

    Is it the problem of my compiler?? Should i go to assembly or thumb mode to reduce time??

    i have also tried with the statements in assembly as

    __asm (mov FIO2PINL,0x0001)

    it gives the same output.

    Can you figure out the problem?? Please help it is argent.

Children
  • 0 in reply to Siddharth Vaidya

    The ideal speed of 18MHz will be for something like this

    LDR R0,=FIO2PIN0
    MOV R1,#0x01
    MOV R2,#0x02

    STRB R1,[R0]
    STRB R2,[R0]
    STRB R1,[R0]
    STRB R2,[R0]
    ....

    ANY data loading instructions in between the STRB will reduce the speed (say a mov instruction - 1 cycle which will be required in your case) will reduce the speed.

    If your requirement is only that a limited sequence output should be fast, then you can hold the data in registers (say R1-R10)and store it to the IO in succession.

    Suvidh

  • 0 in reply to Suvidh Kankariya

    Hi Suvidh,

    Thank you for the explanation. I have to increment the same from 0 to 1024(decimal). and i can not have that many registers. Even if i use the increment then it will waste one cyle.

    I have got a way for it. i am using counters for the same. i am using commands

    FIOPINSET=0x01;
    FIOPINCLR=0x01;

    this usis the same method that u have written. 0x01 is stored in a register and it gives me 18MHz pulses. I am generating the rest from giving this signal to a counter.

    Thank you for the replies.