Hi all, In RTX we can assign a function as a task with the _task_ #NO tag. When calling os_create_task we just pass this task number as a parameter. Assume one has to use banking, in this case, how does RTX identify, in which bank the function exists ? from where does rtx get information about the banks of any task at runtime ? regards pachu
"should i say sorry for posting a question to the forum" Well, it is a Discussion forum - not just a free answer shop...! ;-)
"Well, it is a Discussion forum - not just a free answer shop...! ;-)" Yes, but you can understand the OP's frustration when he sees his thread hijacked by a bunch of people telling him his mission is hopeless instead of answering the question. I'm curious, Mr. Neil and Mr. Malund, please tell us which of these things you have used in an 8051 project: 1) Code banking 2) Floating point 3) RTX
"1) Code banking" Not on an 8051 project - not even with the Triscend E5 (now Zylogic ZE5), where the physical bank switching is trivial. I've suffered a banked project on another 8-bit processor, so I know the pain of trying to decide what goes in the "root" bank, and finding that you want to call function X - but it's in another bank, and a bankswitch at this point is really bad, and having to faff about with the HEX files to program your PROMs properly, and... Code banking is a kludge to overcome the fundamental design restriction in the 8051's address space - just like Expanded Memory was a kludge to overcome the fundamental design restriction in MS-DOS's address space. I can't see why you would want to start a project by designing-in a kludge! "2) Floating point" Never without the aid of a numerical co-processor. "3) RTX" Never on an 8051. Not even with a TCP/IP stack. I've done plenty of RTOS projects with "bigger" processors. If you've decided that a "small" controller like an 8051 is suitable for your project, I can't really see why you should then need to use an RTOS. I've done RTOS projects on other 8-bit micros, and I can't say that the extra grief of working with the RTOS was any benefit over not having an RTOS.
""1) Code banking" Not on an 8051 project" ""2) Floating point" Never without the aid of a numerical co-processor." ""3) RTX" Never on an 8051." You see, this is the thing that gets me down. You are advising the OP not to use these things with little or no information about his project and no experience of using them yourself in the context of the 8051/Keil toolchain. I see that you do have experience of RTOS and code banking on other 8 bit devices, and I'm not surprised that the experience wasn't particularly enjoyable. However, neither of us has experience of the Keil implementations of these things so I don't think it's reasonable to just rule them out, especially without knowing any details of the project they're being used on. I have never used RTOS/code banking with an 8 bit processor and probably never will for a variety or reasons. However, I can see that there may be some applications where speed or timing are not issues in which case these may be perfectly reasonable to use. I do use floating point - lots of it, in most of my projects. The 8051 suits my applications very well and I have no timing issues with the maths. So, in my case, the 8051 is the right processor, the fact that it is not 'suited' to floating point is irrelevant.
"I don't think it's reasonable to just rule them out" I never ruled them out - just posed the question, "is this really a job for an 8051??"