We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
HI,Dear all, I did'nt want to use the SRC and ASM,How can Gen the JC instruction in keil?such as following. I used three byte,but used the union struct must define a double word var,You know,The Keil will gen a assemble code more waste the CPU time.So I have following code,to finish a add with 3-byte,but the keil compiler is not smart. CY = 0; V_0 += 0x07; if(CY) { CY = 0; V_1 += 1; if(CY) { CY = 0; V_2 += 1; } } ********************************** ; CY = 0; ; SOURCE LINE # 1254 CLR CY ; V_0 += 0x07; ; SOURCE LINE # 1255 MOV A,#07H ADD A,V_0 MOV V_0,A ; ; if(CY) ; SOURCE LINE # 1257 JNB CY,?C0017 ; { ; SOURCE LINE # 1258 ; CY = 0; ; SOURCE LINE # 1259 CLR CY ; V_1 += 1; ; SOURCE LINE # 1260 INC V_1 ; ; if(CY) ; SOURCE LINE # 1262 JNB CY,?C0017 ; { ; SOURCE LINE # 1263 ; CY = 0; ; SOURCE LINE # 1264 CLR CY ; V += 1; ; SOURCE LINE # 1265 INC V_2 ; }
Hi, I did'nt want to use the SRC and ASM,How can Gen the JC instruction in keil? I do not want to do anything but wish to have billions $$$, gimmy how todo! (= First of all, your example cannot be optimized with JBC (look at the source more careful to know why; HINT: in this case it requires with two additional GOTO). Secondly: when you need with high-optimized code and see that C-compiler cannot give you needed result - why do you not use ASM/ENDASM macro? Okay, now, perhaps you will be surprised about that CY = 0; is not compiled into CLR C. Keil translates it into two-bytes instruction (exactly to "clear bit" instruction with op-code 0xC2 0xbit_number). CLR C is another instruction which takes only one byte of code (it is separate instruction called "clear carry flag" with op-code 0xC3). Do not ask me why does it do such way - I am not the author of the compiler (= It seems that the compiler takes carry flag as a part of the rest bits and not pay attention that there are some assembly commands related to carry flag especially (here I mean the usage CLR C instead of CLR PSW.7). Just ask authors to implement this feature in the future. Anyway, you have a choice: either use LONG variable or make short in-line ASM block - both are useful. As for me so I preffer to write all the program with pure asm; oh well, Erik - kick me then (= cu
The day that a C compiler is "perfect" will never happen. By the old rule 80% of the improvement can be acieved by 20% of the effort and with the market for customers willing to pay 5 times more than currently for a C compiler being minuscule, do not expect the comiler makers to milk every little bit of efficiency. Erik