• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 22 subscribers
  • Views 1321 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

PC-Lint and RTX166

Stefano Costa

Hello,

has anyone already succesfully configured the wonderful PC-Lint tool for RTX166? I mean, configured so that it does recognize the RTX166 specific sintax for task functions declaration...
Thanks- Stefano Costa

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Stefano Costa

    Hi Stefano,

    thanks for your hint.
    And really for laying XC161 / XC167 together with the XC164 in one header,
    some registers are defined twice.

    ( Header - delivered with µVision2 V2.38a
    C166 V4.27 )

    These ared defined twice:
    ALTSEL0P1H,ALTSEL0P1H_P0,ALTSEL0P1H_P1,
    ALTSEL0P1H_P2,ALTSEL0P1H_P3,ALTSEL0P1H_P4,
    ALTSEL0P1H_P5,ALTSEL0P1H_P6,ALTSEL0P1H_P7

    I simply supressed these with
    -esym(31,.....)

    Stefan

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Stefano Costa

    Hi Stefano,

    thanks for your hint.
    And really for laying XC161 / XC167 together with the XC164 in one header,
    some registers are defined twice.

    ( Header - delivered with µVision2 V2.38a
    C166 V4.27 )

    These ared defined twice:
    ALTSEL0P1H,ALTSEL0P1H_P0,ALTSEL0P1H_P1,
    ALTSEL0P1H_P2,ALTSEL0P1H_P3,ALTSEL0P1H_P4,
    ALTSEL0P1H_P5,ALTSEL0P1H_P6,ALTSEL0P1H_P7

    I simply supressed these with
    -esym(31,.....)

    Stefan

Children
No data