Dear All, I am new in micro controller programming, I have micro controller 89C51 and I need the circuit components and schmatic of the programmer ciruit which is interfaced to the computer with the serial port. Please some can send it to me Thanks Regards Sameh
Of course he is a bit demaning. Didn't you get it. He is the new programmmer.
Arthur P must have added a bit too much AI when he developed his generic programmer. It has given itself a name and started to post on this forum...
The AI component did originally included a good manners element (a classic English implementation).
The specification for that component states that output requests must be polite and complete - So nonsense such as plz is considered to be a non-conformance.
hi can it the code of 8052 and 80534.
we design board for lights and need to program the cpu
youre code. do the 80534 wire to com1 or usb
see www.kmitl.ac.th/.../easy2.htm
OOPS it only program discontinued chips
so i suggest that waleed zawawii discontinue advertising it.
Erik
Hi,
After a long time I came here. And it was a great entertainment reading the enitre thread. :)
Well for programmer, check if this helps.
www.technofreaks.org/topic32.html
But the best answer is already given by Erik and Andy which says "Why, oh why does this activity still go on when there is a plethora of ISP chips available?"
Beginners, please don't just request for schematics and/or programmer details. Read datasheets. It says everything.
And moreover there are sites like http://www.google.com and http://www.wikipedia.org
Please use them before asking such questions.
Regards, Shriram
Note: But what I feel is that people are reluctant to read datasheets :(
Reluctant?
They would rather die than read documentation in any form.
And most importantly: Everything must be free and working yesterday. Time is for data games. Money is for buying faster computers to play pirated games on. No resources of any kind may be spent on school work.
Already the title says it is bull! "programmer for 89 series chips"
The P89LPC program different from the P89C which program different from the P89L which program different from the AT89C which program different from some other AT 89c which programm different from the AT89S which program different from ....
For NXP (nee Philips) use FlashMagic, for Atmel, use FLIP both are free why use some bungling amateurs 'tested', not 'designed' thingy when an authorized, professional solution is available for FREE
erik malund: "For NXP (nee Philips) use FlashMagic, for Atmel, use FLIP both are free why use some bungling amateurs 'tested', not 'designed' thingy when an authorized, professional solution is available for FREE"
Absolutely.
As far as the link is concerned, the progerammer is for ATMEL chips only. The list is included in the documentation. :)
Shriram
So nonsense such as plz is considered to be a non-conformance.
I see no such statement in the manual. Chapter and verse, please.
Arthur Plank, who made the statement is the creator of the gzip programmer. If he states something take it as you take statements from the creators of C. Who gives you the right to deny Arthur what you graciously bestow on K&R.
PS Arthur states "work in progress". Is your manual complete while you work on that project you never get finished because of you spending time on the language instead of the use thereof?
Oh boy...
Arthur Plank: "So nonsense such as plz is considered to be a non-conformance."
Jack Sprat: "I see no such statement in the manual. Chapter and verse, please."
Jack: You see no such statement in what manual???
A chip programmer incorporating a "maximum-compression-go-for-broke-level-10" download algorithm does not need a manual in the traditional sense. It is autodidactive, and autoconfiguring. It is enough that the chip programmer is stored in the same room as a power source (any energy source radiating more than 500uW/m2 for wavelenghts shorter than 950nm should suffice) and a handful of chips, for it to be able to correctly program and verify the chips. For about 90% of the chips, it is also able to download microcode patches to work around existing erratas.
Of course, if you do have suggestions for a manual, feel free to contribute. But before you do, please read this thread fully. Make sure that you understand the concept. Have a good time. Then either contribute, or move to other hunting grounds.
Jack Prat (whoops I meant Sprat) wrote:
If you've seen a copy of the manual then you must have done it in a surreptitious or nefarious manner.
I can say this because (surprise, surprise) the only place the manual exists is in my head.
Please keep out of my head.
Oh, sorry. I thought this thread was a spoof until I read your excellent explanation.
There really is some neat stuff going on out there, huh?
How can a programmer that just about everyone wants a copy of be a spoof?
Well, quite. That should have been obvious to me from the start.
why file hex from keil some 89C51 programmer circuit can do a nother can't program