The following code: fwsUniChar c; fwsUniChar *temp; temp=p->inPtr; c = *temp; temp++; p->inPtr = temp; correctly increments the pointer p by 0x01 instead of fwsUniChar c = p->inPtr++; which incorrectly increments the pointer p by 0x101 This code compiles and runs correctly with ANSI C compilers Also routine1() reentrant { enum ElementTagType type; routine2(&type); } routine2(enum ElementTagType *type) { type = START_TAG; } does not work (i.e. type in routine1 is not set to START_TAG after calling routine 2. There is a default XBPSTACK Any Ideas Thanks Barry
Sorry, bad example use of the ubiquitous name p in this case, since your parameter is also named p. Using your specific example, you would look at the memory allocated to p->inPtr and verify that the 3-byte generic pointer inPtr member changed (or not) as I described.