• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8 replies
  • Subscribers 22 subscribers
  • Views 1557 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Redirecting Interrupt

Ken Chew

Hello,
I'm redirecting my interrupts using the code
--------------------------------------------
CSEG AT 0000BH
LJMP myisr
--------------------------------------------
I've a number of files. Where should I put this code (which file... does it matter)? Should I create a segment called 'myisrtable' and place all ISR address in it?
Regards,
KC

  • 0

    I do not think it matters - as far as the linker - where you put the vectors; however, having the vectors in one module (I do, together with the ISRs) gives the advantage of an immediate view of completeness (you do put reti in unused interrupts, I hope).

    Also I have always had ALL ORG statements in one module (that keeps me from making overlap or gap mistakes as opposed to having ORGs all over the place)

    Erik

  • 0

    I do not think it matters - as far as the linker - where you put the vectors; however, having the vectors in one module (I do, together with the ISRs) gives the advantage of an immediate view of completeness (you do put reti in unused interrupts, I hope).

    Also I have always had ALL ORG statements in one module (that keeps me from making overlap or gap mistakes as opposed to having ORGs all over the place)

    Erik

  • 0

    I do not think it matters - as far as the linker - where you put the vectors; however, having the vectors in one module (I do, together with the ISRs) gives the advantage of an immediate view of completeness (you do put reti in unused interrupts, I hope).

    Also I have always had ALL ORG statements in one module (that keeps me from making overlap or gap mistakes as opposed to having ORGs all over the place)

    Erik

  • 0

    I do not think it matters - as far as the linker - where you put the vectors; however, having the vectors in one module (I do, together with the ISRs) gives the advantage of an immediate view of completeness (you do put reti in unused interrupts, I hope).

    Also I have always had ALL ORG statements in one module (that keeps me from making overlap or gap mistakes as opposed to having ORGs all over the place)

    Erik

  • 0

    I do not think it matters - as far as the linker - where you put the vectors; however, having the vectors in one module (I do, together with the ISRs) gives the advantage of an immediate view of completeness (you do put reti in unused interrupts, I hope).

    Also I have always had ALL ORG statements in one module (that keeps me from making overlap or gap mistakes as opposed to having ORGs all over the place)

    Erik

  • 0

    I do not think it matters - as far as the linker - where you put the vectors; however, having the vectors in one module (I do, together with the ISRs) gives the advantage of an immediate view of completeness (you do put reti in unused interrupts, I hope).

    Also I have always had ALL ORG statements in one module (that keeps me from making overlap or gap mistakes as opposed to having ORGs all over the place)

    Erik

  • 0

    I do not think it matters - as far as the linker - where you put the vectors; however, having the vectors in one module (I do, together with the ISRs) gives the advantage of an immediate view of completeness (you do put reti in unused interrupts, I hope).

    Also I have always had ALL ORG statements in one module (that keeps me from making overlap or gap mistakes as opposed to having ORGs all over the place)

    Erik

  • 0 in reply to erik malund

    Hello,
    Thanks Erik!
    ** there's no need to post 6 times **
    Regards,
    KC