We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
The application note suggests to wrap a timer tick variable in a function which disables all interrupts, reads and copies the variable into a temp, re-enables interrupts, then returns the temp. Can the variable be accessed directly outside of the ISR without disabling interrupts if the timer tick variable is declared as "volatile?"
IMHO, "volatile" really _should_ play a role here. From the point-of-view of the C language definition, any object whose value may change for reasons not explicitly part of the C program itself (e.g. a counter/timer) should still work as expected, *if* it's declared "volatile". It's in the responsibility of the compiler to ensure that it does. For the sake of the 8051, this means that a large fraction of the SFRs should implicitly be considered volatile. If a variable larger than 1 byte is declared "volatile", the compiler would have to turn off interrupts while accessing it automatically. That's one of the effects of the "volatile" qualifier.
From K&R: "The purpose of volatile is to force an implementation to suppress optimisation that could otherwise occur" So there you are: its sole purpose is to control optimisation - not to guarantee atomic accesses, nor anything else.