• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 22 subscribers
  • Views 794 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

INIT.A51 on 80c390?

Kevin Radke

Is it required to include init.a51 to initialize global variables in the 22bit contiguous mode on an 80c390?

If I try and do this, I get a lot of undefined symbols:

assembling INIT.A51...
INIT.A51(59): error A45: UNDEFINED SYMBOL
INIT.A51(65): error A45: UNDEFINED SYMBOL
INIT.A51(88): error A45: UNDEFINED SYMBOL

...

My search of the list and knowledgebase didn't turn up anything specific to the 390.

It looks like the assembler is case sensitive, since I noticed I can fix most of the problems if I correct the case. I took the INIT.A51 file from the v6.22 install directory...

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Jon Ward

    I'm including it because I wasn't seeing global variables initialized correctly.

    It works fine once I fix the label name case differences and include the register definitions header file.

    All I did was add it to an existing project. Is the extended linker case sensitive by default, while the old one wasn't?

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Jon Ward

    I'm including it because I wasn't seeing global variables initialized correctly.

    It works fine once I fix the label name case differences and include the register definitions header file.

    All I did was add it to an existing project. Is the extended linker case sensitive by default, while the old one wasn't?

Children
No data