This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Idea for the next version of µvision

Today, many microcontroller use in-system programming, or other system. So, why µVision could not include one in the next generation?

I think it can be very usefull, no?

Parents
  • I think Erik has a good point but, of course, all generalisations are dangerous! ;-)

    But, in fact, this case does illustrate Erik's point: the more features you add, the harder it is to find the one you actually want!
    As I mentioned earlier, uVision does already have the necessary facilities to support in-system programming - it just requires someone (eg, the chip vendor) to provide the necessary support drivers.

Reply
  • I think Erik has a good point but, of course, all generalisations are dangerous! ;-)

    But, in fact, this case does illustrate Erik's point: the more features you add, the harder it is to find the one you actually want!
    As I mentioned earlier, uVision does already have the necessary facilities to support in-system programming - it just requires someone (eg, the chip vendor) to provide the necessary support drivers.

Children
No data