• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 727 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

T89C51RD2

Francis CAUS

Can I compile C-code for the TEMIX (now ATMEL) T89C51RD2 micro using the old "C51 Professional Developers Kit Version 5.1" ?
Is it sufficient to use the include file REG51RX2.H available on the website or do I need to upgrade the compiler itself?

Parents
  • 0

    Yes. You don't even need the header file to use all the peripherals of any 8051. Just define the sfr's and sbit's in your C files that you use. Here's an example from one of my C files:

    //   Functional Name       Addr            Hardware Name
sfr  r_datBus            = 0x80;        // P0

sfr  r_cmdBus            = 0xA0;        // P2 (lower 4 bits)
sbit r_cmd0              = r_port2 ^ 0; // P2.0
sbit r_cmd1              = r_port2 ^ 1; // P2.1
sbit r_cmd2              = r_port2 ^ 2; // P2.2
sbit r_cmd3              = r_port2 ^ 3; // P2.3
//   GAP                                   P2.4 & P2.5
sbit r_req_              = r_port2 ^ 6; // P2.6
sbit r_ack_              = r_port2 ^ 7; // P2.7

sbit r_enableTiIntr      = r_ie    ^ 0; // IE.EX0
sbit r_TiIntr            = r_tcon  ^ 1; // TCON.IE0
sbit r_negEdge0          = r_tcon  ^ 0; // TCON.IT0
    I don't ever include regXXX.h, don't need them. The only thing you won't get from an older compiler is support for dual-data pointers and things of that nature if they have been recently added to the new compiler.

    - Mark

Reply
  • 0

    Yes. You don't even need the header file to use all the peripherals of any 8051. Just define the sfr's and sbit's in your C files that you use. Here's an example from one of my C files:

    //   Functional Name       Addr            Hardware Name
sfr  r_datBus            = 0x80;        // P0

sfr  r_cmdBus            = 0xA0;        // P2 (lower 4 bits)
sbit r_cmd0              = r_port2 ^ 0; // P2.0
sbit r_cmd1              = r_port2 ^ 1; // P2.1
sbit r_cmd2              = r_port2 ^ 2; // P2.2
sbit r_cmd3              = r_port2 ^ 3; // P2.3
//   GAP                                   P2.4 & P2.5
sbit r_req_              = r_port2 ^ 6; // P2.6
sbit r_ack_              = r_port2 ^ 7; // P2.7

sbit r_enableTiIntr      = r_ie    ^ 0; // IE.EX0
sbit r_TiIntr            = r_tcon  ^ 1; // TCON.IE0
sbit r_negEdge0          = r_tcon  ^ 0; // TCON.IT0
    I don't ever include regXXX.h, don't need them. The only thing you won't get from an older compiler is support for dual-data pointers and things of that nature if they have been recently added to the new compiler.

    - Mark

Children
No data