• Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 136 subscribers
  • Views 12304 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

OpenGL ES 3.0 Context

Adam Noviria
Note: This was originally posted on 26th April 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

Hi,
I would like to know how to create a proper OpenGL ES 3.0 Context with OpenGL ES 3.0 Emulator
The only example that came with it only use OpenGL ES 2.0 context, and according to the User Guide i need to use EGL_RENDERABLE_TYPE,EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT attributes and EGL_CONTEXT_CLIENT_VERSION,3 contextattributes

BUT, apparently EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT (nor EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT_KHR) is not defined anywhere, so i wonder if OpenGL ES 3.0 Emulator really support ES 3.0 ?

Also, what is the best way to make a 3D program that can fallback to ES 2.0 when ES 3.0 is not supported without building a different program for each of them (and if possible to fallback to ES 1.x if Es 2.0 is not supported also)?
Do i need to use EGL_RENDERABLE_TYPE,(EGL_OPENGL_ES_BIT | EGL_OPENGL_ES2_BIT | EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT) for multiple ES support? any example how to use it? (so player can change between 3.0, 2.0 and 1.x on the fly)
Of course each of them will have a different rendering engine where ES 3.0 will use more advanced visual effect, i just need the example on creating ES 3.0,ES 2.0 and ES 1.x Context (all 3 of them using fallback method) within a single source code (if it's possible)


Thanks in advance
Parents
  • Note: This was originally posted on 3rd May 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

    Hi Adam,

    I have spoken to some of my colleagues that work on the OpenGL ES 3.0 Emulator and you are correct the EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT is not defined anywhere and this will be fixed in a later release. However the emulator does define EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT_KHR. This can be located in the eglext.h header file.

    I have spoken to my colleagues about what the best way to fallback on the most appropriate OpenGL ES version and we believe the best idea is to do it in stages. First look for configurations that support (EGL_RENDERABLE_TYPE, EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT_KHR) and if a desired one can't be found move down to EGL_OPENGL_ES2_BIT and so on. We don't believe you can try all three at the same time (EGL_RENDERABLE_TYPE, EGL_OPENGL_ES_BIT | EGL_OPENGL_ES2_BIT | EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT_KHR) because we think only configurations that support all 3 will be shown. There is no sample code yet showing you how to do this but we are working to release some soon.

    Hope this helps,
    Stephen
Reply
  • Note: This was originally posted on 3rd May 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

    Hi Adam,

    I have spoken to some of my colleagues that work on the OpenGL ES 3.0 Emulator and you are correct the EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT is not defined anywhere and this will be fixed in a later release. However the emulator does define EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT_KHR. This can be located in the eglext.h header file.

    I have spoken to my colleagues about what the best way to fallback on the most appropriate OpenGL ES version and we believe the best idea is to do it in stages. First look for configurations that support (EGL_RENDERABLE_TYPE, EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT_KHR) and if a desired one can't be found move down to EGL_OPENGL_ES2_BIT and so on. We don't believe you can try all three at the same time (EGL_RENDERABLE_TYPE, EGL_OPENGL_ES_BIT | EGL_OPENGL_ES2_BIT | EGL_OPENGL_ES3_BIT_KHR) because we think only configurations that support all 3 will be shown. There is no sample code yet showing you how to do this but we are working to release some soon.

    Hope this helps,
    Stephen
Children
No data