Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Education Hub
Distinguished Ambassadors
Open Source Software and Platforms
Research Collaboration and Enablement
Forums
AI and ML forum
Architectures and Processors forum
Arm Development Platforms forum
Arm Development Studio forum
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
Automotive forum
Compilers and Libraries forum
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
High Performance Computing (HPC) forum
Infrastructure Solutions forum
Internet of Things (IoT) forum
Keil forum
Morello forum
Operating Systems forum
SoC Design and Simulation forum
SystemReady Forum
Blogs
AI and ML blog
Announcements
Architectures and Processors blog
Automotive blog
Graphics, Gaming, and VR blog
High Performance Computing (HPC) blog
Infrastructure Solutions blog
Internet of Things (IoT) blog
Operating Systems blog
SoC Design and Simulation blog
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
Support
Arm Support Services
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Support forums
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
FBO doesn't work?
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
4 replies
Subscribers
136 subscribers
Views
4071 views
Users
0 members are here
Mali-GPU
Mali-400
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
FBO doesn't work?
Christopher Van Kirk
over 11 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 12th September 2011 at
http://forums.arm.com
Sorry, this is a repost of a question I added to someone else's thread. It's a similar issue, but went unanswered. I kind of need to get an answer on this:
I create the FBO, bind it to a texture, check the status to make sure it's framebuffer complete, then set it to the rendering buffer, and call DrawElements. DrawElements fails with "GL_INVALID_FRAMEBUFFER_OPERATION" error. This is a bit of a mystery since I check the completeness status on the line immediately prior to the draw call and it claims to be framebuffer complete.
Do the settings on the texture object matter, e.g. repeat/linear/reflect. Does Mali require me to specify a depth or stencil buffer? Does it require an alpha channel?
This code works on Tegra2 and Adreno 205. Not sure why Mali doesn't like it.
Cheers!
Edit: Added example Android code that doesn't work as it should on the SGS2.
Parents
Pete
over 11 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 20th September 2011 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hiya,
I looked further into it, and I think I found the last bits that needed fixing to make it run on the Galaxy SII. Not only does the call to glDrawElements() need to switch from GL_UNSIGNED_INT to GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, but also the underlying index buffer for the quad needs fixing.
I changed:
_quadi to a short array
_qib to a ShortBuffer
and fixed the _qib initializer to:
_qib = ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(_quadi.length * 2).order(ByteOrder.nativeOrder()).asShortBuffer();
Now the APK runs OK I believe:
Please note though, it appears to be using FBOs to render a scene to a texture twice the size of the screen, then using bilinear filtering when plotting the texture to the screen as a sort of antialiasing effect.
This isn't how I'd recommend achieving this effect on Mali - it already supports 4x fullscreen antialiasing for almost no performance cost, just by selecting an appropriate EGL config with EGL_SAMPLES set to 4. We hope to have an example how to detect Mali and enable this in your APKs uploaded to the portal in the next few weeks, and I'd recommend that method instead - it will be much more efficient in terms of memory consumption (no need for a large texture).
There are a few other issues with the application such as allocating twice as much texture memory as is necessary (uses an int rather than a short, when the data is only RGB565) and it passes the texture flag "hasTexture" from a uniform in the vertex shader via a varying which is wasteful - it should really just access the same uniform from the fragment shader.
HTH, Pete
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Reply
Pete
over 11 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 20th September 2011 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hiya,
I looked further into it, and I think I found the last bits that needed fixing to make it run on the Galaxy SII. Not only does the call to glDrawElements() need to switch from GL_UNSIGNED_INT to GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, but also the underlying index buffer for the quad needs fixing.
I changed:
_quadi to a short array
_qib to a ShortBuffer
and fixed the _qib initializer to:
_qib = ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(_quadi.length * 2).order(ByteOrder.nativeOrder()).asShortBuffer();
Now the APK runs OK I believe:
Please note though, it appears to be using FBOs to render a scene to a texture twice the size of the screen, then using bilinear filtering when plotting the texture to the screen as a sort of antialiasing effect.
This isn't how I'd recommend achieving this effect on Mali - it already supports 4x fullscreen antialiasing for almost no performance cost, just by selecting an appropriate EGL config with EGL_SAMPLES set to 4. We hope to have an example how to detect Mali and enable this in your APKs uploaded to the portal in the next few weeks, and I'd recommend that method instead - it will be much more efficient in terms of memory consumption (no need for a large texture).
There are a few other issues with the application such as allocating twice as much texture memory as is necessary (uses an int rather than a short, when the data is only RGB565) and it passes the texture flag "hasTexture" from a uniform in the vertex shader via a varying which is wasteful - it should really just access the same uniform from the fragment shader.
HTH, Pete
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Children
No data