• State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 12884 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

ARMv8A AEM FVP not run on Centos 7

Oscar Huang

I downloaded The latest Armv8-A Base Platform FVP: Architecture Envelope Model for Armv8-A from developer.arm.com/.../fixed-virtual-platforms. After I installed it on my Centos7 machine. I ran FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A, but got these errors:

./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.8' not found (required by ./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A)
./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.22' not found (required by ./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A)
./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.9' not found (required by ./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A)
./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found (required by ./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A)
./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by ./FVP_Base_RevC-2xAEMv8A)

The FVP was based on Fast Models 11.10 per the release note.

I tried to use the libstdc++.so.6 coming with the FVP package in the subfolder linux-2.5-x86_64, but I still got some of those errors. How to fix this? 

Parents
  • 0 in reply to Rob Kaye

    Thanks, Rob. My machine does have an older version of gcc (v4.8.). I have to keep using this old version due to some other applications. I have two more questions:

    1. Since the FVP is a binary release, why not pack its dependencies together, so that it won't rely on the gcc version on the target machine?

    2. What's the purpose of the libstdc++.so.6 file in the subfolder linux-2.5-x86_64 in the installation folder?

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Rob Kaye

    Thanks, Rob. My machine does have an older version of gcc (v4.8.). I have to keep using this old version due to some other applications. I have two more questions:

    1. Since the FVP is a binary release, why not pack its dependencies together, so that it won't rely on the gcc version on the target machine?

    2. What's the purpose of the libstdc++.so.6 file in the subfolder linux-2.5-x86_64 in the installation folder?

Children
No data