I would like to check if Arm Compiler for Embedded FuSa 6.16.2 (armclang) targeting Cortex‑R5 with '-O0' optimization exhibits the same memory reload suppression issue as described in the [ThreadX GitHub issue #334](Found a bug which causes tx_byte_allocate() not thread-safe when use -O3 optimization!! · Issue #334 · eclipse-threadx/threadx) occurs with GCC when optimization level is '-O2 or higher'.
My question is:
- Does the Arm Compiler for Embedded FuSa 6.16.2 (armclang) with '-O0' also suppress memory reloads in similar circumstances?- If so, under what conditions or code patterns does this occur?- Are there any known workarounds or compiler flags to disable this behavior?
Environment details:
- 'Compiler': Arm Compiler for Embedded FuSa 6.16.2 (armclang)- 'Target': Cortex‑R5- 'Optimization level': `-O0`- 'Context': Verifying whether memory reload suppression (removal of redundant loads/stores without explicit volatile) takes place.
Any insights, prior reports, or recommended tests to confirm this would be greatly appreciated.
Please raise an official support case from the Support menu below.