Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
Cortex-A9 AMP
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
8 replies
Subscribers
119 subscribers
Views
6972 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
Cortex-A9 AMP
Clemens Fischer
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 8th January 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
I am currently examining amp for embedded devices.
Is it possible to boot two operating systems on an Cortex-A9 in amp mode?
The p2020 power processor is capable of amp and there is an implementation in u-boot that makes it possible to boot two os in amp mode. Is there a similar implementation for the Cortex-A9? And if not, is it possible and what steps are necessary to implement amp with the Cortex-A9 cpu using u-boot or a different boot loader?
Any information would be helpful.
Best regards
Clemens
Parents
Djordje Kovacevic
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 13th January 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Clemens,
>>What other shared ressources are there that are visible to both OSes?
Is there external cache controller on your H/W (PL310)? That would be another shared resource. Without any synchronization among OSs there will be limited set of PL310 cache maintenance operations. (Only atomic operation by physical address can be issued concurrently by both CPUs.)
I understand that you would keep SCU (snoop control unit) off & all memory marked as not-shared. That will also prevent broadcasts of MMU maintenance operations on internal cache, TLB & branch predictor.
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Reply
Djordje Kovacevic
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 13th January 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Clemens,
>>What other shared ressources are there that are visible to both OSes?
Is there external cache controller on your H/W (PL310)? That would be another shared resource. Without any synchronization among OSs there will be limited set of PL310 cache maintenance operations. (Only atomic operation by physical address can be issued concurrently by both CPUs.)
I understand that you would keep SCU (snoop control unit) off & all memory marked as not-shared. That will also prevent broadcasts of MMU maintenance operations on internal cache, TLB & branch predictor.
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Children
No data