• Locked Locked
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 119 subscribers
  • Views 4315 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

ARM Linker Address Map

Senthil Ramakrishnan
Note: This was originally posted on 22nd November 2009 at http://forums.arm.com

Hi All,

Im new to this forum and pretty new to ARM development.
When Im compiling my SW in THumb mode the symbol names
in .map file shows Unaligned memory addresses(Eg: 0x225571).
But the symbol is actually placed in address aligned address(0x225570).
Can anybody explain why linker map shows unaligned address?

Thanks
Parents
  • Note: This was originally posted on 22nd November 2009 at http://forums.arm.com

    I think this amounts to the samething, consider:

    [font="Lucida Console"]LDR r0,datalabel
    BX r0
    ...
    datalabel DCD somefunc[/font]

    Here, the value inserted for [font="Lucida Console"]somefunc [/font] needs to have the LSB set if [font="Lucida Console"]somefunc [/font] is the symbol for a Thumb function. At which point the Thumb function code will reside at a halfword aligned location, whereas the symbol will be unaligned due to the least-significant-bit being set.

    hth
    s.


    Your explanation makes sense, provided a function is being jumped onto with change in mode.
    Or in otherwords if a Thumb function ever needs to be called from ARM code the function start address
    will have its LSB set.
    I compile all the code in Thumb mode but with interwork enabled.
    Is this the reason I see the symbol
    addresses in non-aligned addresses in Linker address map and in my debugger when I examine
    the memory, functions are all in aligned addresses.

    Thanks
Reply
  • Note: This was originally posted on 22nd November 2009 at http://forums.arm.com

    I think this amounts to the samething, consider:

    [font="Lucida Console"]LDR r0,datalabel
    BX r0
    ...
    datalabel DCD somefunc[/font]

    Here, the value inserted for [font="Lucida Console"]somefunc [/font] needs to have the LSB set if [font="Lucida Console"]somefunc [/font] is the symbol for a Thumb function. At which point the Thumb function code will reside at a halfword aligned location, whereas the symbol will be unaligned due to the least-significant-bit being set.

    hth
    s.


    Your explanation makes sense, provided a function is being jumped onto with change in mode.
    Or in otherwords if a Thumb function ever needs to be called from ARM code the function start address
    will have its LSB set.
    I compile all the code in Thumb mode but with interwork enabled.
    Is this the reason I see the symbol
    addresses in non-aligned addresses in Linker address map and in my debugger when I examine
    the memory, functions are all in aligned addresses.

    Thanks
Children
No data