Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
armcc problem?
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
4 replies
Subscribers
119 subscribers
Views
4363 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
armcc problem?
Ric Peregrino
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 20th April 2009 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hello,
We're using armcc here version:
ARM/Thumb C/C++ Compiler, RVCT3.1 [Build 739]
And it seems to have an issue. Here's some simple c-code:
main () {
volatile unsigned int tmp32;
printf ("GPIO: 1_reset: before\n");
// touch tb_gpio
*(unsigned int *)(0x50000004) = 0x12345678;
tmp32 = *((volatile unsigned int *)(0x50000004));
printf ("GPIO: tmp32 = 0x%0x\n", tmp32);
printf ("GPIO: tmp32 = 0x%0x\n", tmp32);
if (tmp32 != 0x12345678) printf("FAIL: 1st tb_gpio WRV failed!\n");
Here's the resulting output:
# GPIO: 1_reset: before
# GPIO: tmp32 = 0x12345678
# GPIO: tmp32 = 0x0
# FAIL: 1st tb_gpio WRV failed!
Why is the 2nd printf of tmp32 different? Here's the disassembled code, and it seems that the first printf is printing not tmp32 which is in r4, but the literal that was written, which is in r6:
0x00040082: 4e2b +N LDR r6,[pc,#172] ; [0x40130] = 0x12345678
0x00040084: f04f45a0 O..E MOV r5,#0x50000000
0x00040088: 606e n` STR r6,[r5,#4]
0x0004008a: 686c lh LDR r4,[r5,#4]
0x0004008c: 4631 1F MOV r1,r6
0x0004008e: a029 ). ADR r0,{pc}+0xa6 ; 0x40134
0x00040090: f000fcf6 .... BL __0printf ; 0x40a80
0x00040094: 4621 !F MOV r1,r4
0x00040096: a027 '. ADR r0,{pc}+0x9e ; 0x40134
0x00040098: f000fcf2 .... BL __0printf ; 0x40a80
This make sense? Is this an armcc bug? If so, what next?
Cheers,
Ric Peregrino
Dust Networks
Parents
Peter Harris
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 21st April 2009 at
http://forums.arm.com
That looks like a compiler bug to me - although I'm not a C spec expert...
Can you try patching RVCT to the latest patch level (3.1 Build 794) and see if the issue still occurs? There were some known issues with volatiles in builds at high optimization levels which have since been fixed.
The patch download can be found here: [url="
http://www.arm.com/support/downloads/RVDS_31.html
"]
http://www.arm.com/support/downloads/RVDS_31.html[/url]
If you still have a problem can you also post the compiler and linker command lines you used?
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Reply
Peter Harris
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 21st April 2009 at
http://forums.arm.com
That looks like a compiler bug to me - although I'm not a C spec expert...
Can you try patching RVCT to the latest patch level (3.1 Build 794) and see if the issue still occurs? There were some known issues with volatiles in builds at high optimization levels which have since been fixed.
The patch download can be found here: [url="
http://www.arm.com/support/downloads/RVDS_31.html
"]
http://www.arm.com/support/downloads/RVDS_31.html[/url]
If you still have a problem can you also post the compiler and linker command lines you used?
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Children
No data