Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
ARM Vs GCC assembler
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
13 replies
Subscribers
119 subscribers
Views
11080 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
ARM Vs GCC assembler
Gerald Murphy
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 25th January 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
I have a question regarding the ARM and GCC assemblers i.e. ARMASM and GAS.
MOV.W R4,#0x87C0 is translated to F248_74C0 by ARMASM.
However, GAS throws up the error "invalid constant (87c0) after fixup" for the same instruction. Why does GAS give an error for this?
I realise the operand is 16-bit but I'm using the '.syntax unified'. I thought GAS supports .W and .N suffixes. Even without the .W suffix, GAS gives the same error whereas ARMASM quietly expands the 16-bit instruction to 32-bit.
I'm using 'GCC version 4.7.2 (Sourcety CodeBench Lite 2012.09-63).
Any insight as to why GAS is giving an error is appreciated. The workaround is to use two instructions. The following 2 instructions compile OK.
MOVW R4 ,#0xC0
MOVT R4 ,#0x87
Thanks and regards,
Ger
Parents
Kenneth Hass
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 25th January 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
For ARMv7-M,
MOV.W R4, #87C0
is incorrect but
MOVW R4, #87C0
is assembled by the gnu assembler to f248 74c0, using the T3 encoding of the MOV instruction.
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Reply
Kenneth Hass
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 25th January 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
For ARMv7-M,
MOV.W R4, #87C0
is incorrect but
MOVW R4, #87C0
is assembled by the gnu assembler to f248 74c0, using the T3 encoding of the MOV instruction.
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Children
No data