• Locked Locked
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 119 subscribers
  • Views 3760 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

OMAP3: encountered a blocking structure assignment, occurring only on OMAP3 processors

Wolfgang Hauser
Parents
  • Arm Employee Badge
    Note: This was originally posted on 29th July 2012 at http://forums.arm.com

    I've not looked in much detail, but as a thought, your code may not be compliant with the C++ standard; are you sure that "(m_buffer->bb + offs)" meets the alignment requirements of a "c_t"/"a_t" structure? It could be that the compiler is legally assuming a certain alignment for the structure copy and is using instructions which turn out to be incompatible with the alignment produced by your cast from a char array pointer.

    hth
    s.
Reply
  • Arm Employee Badge
    Note: This was originally posted on 29th July 2012 at http://forums.arm.com

    I've not looked in much detail, but as a thought, your code may not be compliant with the C++ standard; are you sure that "(m_buffer->bb + offs)" meets the alignment requirements of a "c_t"/"a_t" structure? It could be that the compiler is legally assuming a certain alignment for the structure copy and is using instructions which turn out to be incompatible with the alignment produced by your cast from a char array pointer.

    hth
    s.
Children
No data