Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
NEON vs VFP usage
Locked
Locked
Replies
6 replies
Subscribers
119 subscribers
Views
10017 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
NEON vs VFP usage
Marius Cetateanu
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 29th August 2011 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
Could I use NEON and VFP at the same time in my application?
What would be the downsides of that?
I read also in the documentation that the compilation flags are as following:
GCC
-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp
-mfpu=vfpv3 -mfloat-abi=softfp
ARMCC
--cpu=Cortex-A9 --apcs=/softfp
--cpu=Cortex-A9 --fpu=VFPv3 --apcs=/softfp
Do this control just the usage of NEON intrinsics? Does specifying th option for one(e.g. neon)
prevents me from using the other(e.g. vfp) directly in the code?
Also specifying "softfp" seems to incur some overhead in my application(at least from the preliminary benchmarks).
I tried to use the "hard" option but then I have linkage error as the runtime libraries are not built with support for that.
Could I get somewhere the runtime libraries built with "hard" or do I have to do it myself?
Thanks
0
Quote