We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.
Hi Experts,
I could find two versions of RTX here. Even though i got an application note on porting RTX to CMSIS RTX I got few confusions with the below links.
http://www.keil.com/support/man/docs/rlarm/rlarm_ar_config_title.htm
Vs
CMSIS-RTOS RTX: Configuration of CMSIS-RTOS RTX
Which one will be preferable and latest ?
Whether the reference can be picked from both or should concentrate on one ?
Hey, use the CMSIS one!
The other one does mention RL. This is RealView Library. I don't believe you use RL-RTX so you don't want that one!
Oh well I go by cmsis.
Bit curious on usage of real view library :-)
Is RL the prior version or meant for different purpose !!
Regards,
Techguyz
Rather different purpose... Overview of the Keil Real-Time Library
As you can see on that page, Real Time library used to be separate and is now part of MDK-ARM professional.
I advised CMSIS because its benefits are much wider than helping you integrate an RTOS.
Of course, if an expert disagrees with my non-expert opinion, they should speak up!
Hello Techguyz,
you should use CMSIS-RTOS RTX. This is the latest version of RTX and is part of our ARM::CMSIS Software Pack with support for MDK Version 5. To understand the differences, we have created an application note that is basically a migration guide. You'll find that document here: Application Note 264: Migrate from RTX to CMSIS-RTOS
Kind regards,
Christopher