• Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 119 subscribers
  • Views 2843 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Convolution problem

deniz gurhan
Note: This was originally posted on 20th August 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

When i obtain high pass filter using arm_conv_partial_f32 function instead of arm_fir_f32 function; i get same output array with opposite signs. This situation is not seen when i use low pass or mid pass filter. Anyone help?
Parents
  • Note: This was originally posted on 22nd August 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

    Of course, stupid of me. It makes sense. Thanks a lot Paul.


    I have a hunch what is happening.  The FIR filter function arm_fir_f32() requires that the filter coefficients be in time reversed order.  The arm_conv_partial_f32() has the coefficients in normal order.  In a high pass filter, the coefficients typically alternate in sign.  If the length of the filter is even then time flipping the filter is equivalent to scaling by -1.


Reply
  • Note: This was originally posted on 22nd August 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

    Of course, stupid of me. It makes sense. Thanks a lot Paul.


    I have a hunch what is happening.  The FIR filter function arm_fir_f32() requires that the filter coefficients be in time reversed order.  The arm_conv_partial_f32() has the coefficients in normal order.  In a high pass filter, the coefficients typically alternate in sign.  If the length of the filter is even then time flipping the filter is equivalent to scaling by -1.


Children
No data