Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
ARM Workbench IDE 4.0 error on Linux64
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
3 replies
Subscribers
118 subscribers
Views
3686 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
ARM Workbench IDE 4.0 error on Linux64
Wojciech Zebrowski
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 6th September 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi
I try execute IDE 4.0 on Linux64 system centos . The problem is past execution ARM Workbench IDE v4.0 . I've get message with error .
Please give me any advice how solve this problem.
WZ
Wojciech Zebrowski
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 6th September 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Log with error :
Error code: LAUNCHER-11
armenv returned with error(s).
Command was:
"/ahome/wojtekz/ARM/Utilities/Installer/2.3/220/linux-pentium/armenv" -r "/ahome/wojtekz/ARM" -p RVDS Contents 4.1 158 -v platform "linux-pentium" -v extras_dir "professional/" -v encryption "none" -v regime "rel" -v capability "professional" --exec "/ahome/wojtekz/.awide/4.0/launcher-linux-pentium"
Note this may be the expected behaviour if the target process returned with error
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Wojciech Zebrowski
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 10th September 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
i try execute like that:
.awide/4.0/launcher-linux-pentium
The error during check valid license .
Case closed
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Scott Douglass
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 7th September 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Unfortunately CentOS isn't listed in the supported platforms list. You might be able to get it working by installing CentOS 32-bit compatibility libraries, but I'm afraid I don't know the details of how to do it.
[It looks like you really have RVDS 4.1 installed.]
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel