• Locked Locked
  • Replies 10 replies
  • Subscribers 119 subscribers
  • Views 7177 views
  • Users 0 members are here
2025 survey

We are running a survey to help us improve the experience for all of our members. If you see the survey appear, please take the time to tell us about your experience if you can.

Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

TrustZone with PL310

syuji biwa
Note: This was originally posted on 17th August 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

I plan to use a simple 'TrustZone Monitor'  with PL310(L2CC).
In non-secure, I will play a Linux-Kernel.

One problem.
1. PL310's background-operation(inv.way etc..)  is executing in non-secure.
2. By secure-interrupt, dispatch to secure.
3. In secure, try to execute a write-operation to PL310' register.
May be happen 'DATA-ABORT'.

Do I must control exclusive PL310  secure and non-secure ?

Please help me.
Parents
  • Note: This was originally posted on 24th August 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

    Thanks.

    > you may need to set up exclusive access
    If non-secureOS is hang in spinlock, SecureOS nerver get a spinlock.
    When secureOS try to get a spinlock in FIQ, secureOS is dead-lock.

    SecureOS's implementation is so difficult.
    SecureOS may be better not to use cache. (no-MMU only.)
Reply
  • Note: This was originally posted on 24th August 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

    Thanks.

    > you may need to set up exclusive access
    If non-secureOS is hang in spinlock, SecureOS nerver get a spinlock.
    When secureOS try to get a spinlock in FIQ, secureOS is dead-lock.

    SecureOS's implementation is so difficult.
    SecureOS may be better not to use cache. (no-MMU only.)
Children
No data