• Locked Locked
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 119 subscribers
  • Views 3824 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

3x ARM

Marc Rainer Kranz
Note: This was originally posted on 3rd March 2013 at http://forums.arm.com

I am aware, i have few robust reasons against it: an ARM assembler, outputting ARM code
from a bare assembly language source and the whole... running on ARM.

it is fascinating me though :rolleyes:
What is your opinion, and why pros or contras ?

Thank You in advance,
Marc

p.s. should be this one a topic poll ?
Parents
  • Note: This was originally posted on 5th March 2013 at http://forums.arm.com


    Well... you can already do this.  The GNU tool chain can be built to run on ARM, and to output ARM.  But you would need an ARM system running Linux.

    hallo ttfn,
    thanks for answering. supposing an ARM system running Linux being enough mature to run such a "huge" toolchain,
    well, the best option i see, relating to tools like Keil armasm.exe, consists in a binary translation of it.
    also the question is now:
    how much is this a suggestable way,  considering i would like to avoid to rewrite the wheel
    one more time again for ARM too.
Reply
  • Note: This was originally posted on 5th March 2013 at http://forums.arm.com


    Well... you can already do this.  The GNU tool chain can be built to run on ARM, and to output ARM.  But you would need an ARM system running Linux.

    hallo ttfn,
    thanks for answering. supposing an ARM system running Linux being enough mature to run such a "huge" toolchain,
    well, the best option i see, relating to tools like Keil armasm.exe, consists in a binary translation of it.
    also the question is now:
    how much is this a suggestable way,  considering i would like to avoid to rewrite the wheel
    one more time again for ARM too.
Children
No data