Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
Assertion of IRQS is not causing calling of ISR
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
9 replies
Subscribers
119 subscribers
Views
5261 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
Assertion of IRQS is not causing calling of ISR
Lokesh Kumar
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 4th September 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
With my current flow, when I am asserting legacy nIRQ I am able to jump to ISR, but not when asserting IRQS[0].
I have enabled interrupts as below
[size=2]CPSIE ifa, #18
and configured [size=2]Interrupt Security ([/size][/size][size=2][size=2]ICDISR), [size=2][/size][/size][/size][size=2][size=2][size=2][size=2]Interrupt Edge Trigger Config ([/size]ICDIF),[size=2]Interrupt Priority (ICDIPR)[/size][/size][/size][/size],[size=2]Interrupt Target Processor (ICDIPTR),[size=2]Interrupt Enable (ICDISER),[size=2]Interrupt Priority Mask (ICCPMR),[size=2]Interrupt Binary Point (ICCBPR),[size=2]Interface Control Register (ICCICR),[size=2]Distributor Control Register (ICDDCR)
Am I missing something?
Is something separate need to be done, when using IRQS interrupts?
Thanks
Lokesh
[/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
Parents
Lokesh Kumar
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 4th September 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
ttfn,
Is that vector address will be different for IRQS[0] compared to nIRQ?
If so what is logic to derive vector address for IRQS[0].. IRQS[n]?
For nIRQ as suggested I am using base address + 0x18
VecTable
LDR pc, [pc,#0x18]
Is this same same for all IRQ or different for different IRQS?
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Reply
Lokesh Kumar
over 12 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 4th September 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
ttfn,
Is that vector address will be different for IRQS[0] compared to nIRQ?
If so what is logic to derive vector address for IRQS[0].. IRQS[n]?
For nIRQ as suggested I am using base address + 0x18
VecTable
LDR pc, [pc,#0x18]
Is this same same for all IRQ or different for different IRQS?
Cancel
Vote up
0
Vote down
Cancel
Children
No data