Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Research Collaboration and Enablement
DesignStart
Education Hub
Innovation
Open Source Software and Platforms
Forums
AI and ML forum
Architectures and Processors forum
Arm Development Platforms forum
Arm Development Studio forum
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
Automotive forum
Compilers and Libraries forum
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
High Performance Computing (HPC) forum
Infrastructure Solutions forum
Internet of Things (IoT) forum
Keil forum
Morello Forum
Operating Systems forum
SoC Design and Simulation forum
中文社区论区
Blogs
AI and ML blog
Announcements
Architectures and Processors blog
Automotive blog
Graphics, Gaming, and VR blog
High Performance Computing (HPC) blog
Infrastructure Solutions blog
Innovation blog
Internet of Things (IoT) blog
Operating Systems blog
Research Articles
SoC Design and Simulation blog
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
中文社区博客
Support
Arm Support Services
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
SWO and variables reading
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
13 replies
Subscribers
121 subscribers
Views
5902 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
SWO and variables reading
Offline
Pietsuro Botsutoshi
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 27th February 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Dear all,
I would like to create a SWV application, and my question is the following: how many variables can I read via SWO communication?
I mean, without considering the overflow packet that could be sent in case of huge information traffic, is there a physical limit regarding this topic?
If I've understood weel, DWT_COMPx registers, with x={1, .., 4} is used in order to store the variable address that I would like to monitor, and DWT_MASKx are also used in order to raise a valid new SWO packet.
Does this mean that it's possible to check only for four variables, or should I set the mask register in order to detect ranges of variables?
With the latter case I could be able to monitor a very large number of items.
Am I wrong or is this the right approach?
Thank you very much!
Parents
Offline
Joseph Yiu
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 10th April 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. I was having a very busy schedule last week.
Try think of it as bit stream
The sync packet is 47 bit of 0 followed by a 1.
Depends on your synchronization situation before you get the first byte, you might have already missed 7 bit of zeros which was merged into last bytes.
Then you get 1 byte of zeros (8 bits), so you get minimum of 4 bytes of sub sequence zeros.
Then you will get things like
xxxxxxx1, or
xxxxxx10, or
xxxxx100, or
...
10000000
If MASK size is set to 0x2 (word size), the address value set in COMPx must be multiple of word size.
So your solution does not work.
regards,
Joseph
P.S. I am out of office next two weeks.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Reply
Offline
Joseph Yiu
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 10th April 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. I was having a very busy schedule last week.
Try think of it as bit stream
The sync packet is 47 bit of 0 followed by a 1.
Depends on your synchronization situation before you get the first byte, you might have already missed 7 bit of zeros which was merged into last bytes.
Then you get 1 byte of zeros (8 bits), so you get minimum of 4 bytes of sub sequence zeros.
Then you will get things like
xxxxxxx1, or
xxxxxx10, or
xxxxx100, or
...
10000000
If MASK size is set to 0x2 (word size), the address value set in COMPx must be multiple of word size.
So your solution does not work.
regards,
Joseph
P.S. I am out of office next two weeks.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Children
No data