Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Research Collaboration and Enablement
DesignStart
Education Hub
Innovation
Open Source Software and Platforms
Forums
AI and ML forum
Architectures and Processors forum
Arm Development Platforms forum
Arm Development Studio forum
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
Automotive forum
Compilers and Libraries forum
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
High Performance Computing (HPC) forum
Infrastructure Solutions forum
Internet of Things (IoT) forum
Keil forum
Morello Forum
Operating Systems forum
SoC Design and Simulation forum
中文社区论区
Blogs
AI and ML blog
Announcements
Architectures and Processors blog
Automotive blog
Graphics, Gaming, and VR blog
High Performance Computing (HPC) blog
Infrastructure Solutions blog
Innovation blog
Internet of Things (IoT) blog
Operating Systems blog
Research Articles
SoC Design and Simulation blog
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
中文社区博客
Support
Arm Support Services
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
SWO and variables reading
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
13 replies
Subscribers
121 subscribers
Views
5902 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
SWO and variables reading
Offline
Pietsuro Botsutoshi
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 27th February 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Dear all,
I would like to create a SWV application, and my question is the following: how many variables can I read via SWO communication?
I mean, without considering the overflow packet that could be sent in case of huge information traffic, is there a physical limit regarding this topic?
If I've understood weel, DWT_COMPx registers, with x={1, .., 4} is used in order to store the variable address that I would like to monitor, and DWT_MASKx are also used in order to raise a valid new SWO packet.
Does this mean that it's possible to check only for four variables, or should I set the mask register in order to detect ranges of variables?
With the latter case I could be able to monitor a very large number of items.
Am I wrong or is this the right approach?
Thank you very much!
Parents
Offline
Joseph Yiu
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 23rd March 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
Regarding DWTx_MASK:
0 = 1 byte
1 = 2 bytes
2 = 4 bytes
3 = 8 bytes
4 = 16 bytes , ..., etc
> DWT_COMPx = address of the variable to monitor (if several variables are contiguously defined, then here the lower address)
Please note that you need to have the address value being multiple of the compare address size. For example, if DWTx_MASK is set to 4 (16 bytes), then the address value should be multiple of 16.
You can use DWT to halt the processor when the PC match a certain value. In that case you need to set the Func field in DWTx_FUNC to 0x4.
But for monitoring variables using SWO you use function 1 - 3, and 12-15, with DWTx_COMP being the address value of the variable(s).
You can setup the DWTx_MASK to capture multiple variables in an address range, but by doing so you will need to emit the address values as well so that you can tell which variable of that address range is being accessed. Also, if you try to capture a large address range you can easily get buffer overflow in the trace system.
In most cases, since there are only maximum of 4 comparators in DWT, a debugger will limit the number of software variables that you can monitor to 4 to make it easier to handle.
If you want to generate a packet when a byte in 0x2000017C is written to, then
DWT_CTRL = 0x400003FE
DWT_COMP0 = 0x2000017C (address to monitor)
DWT_MASK0 = 0x0000000 (1 byte to monitor)
DWT_FUNCTION0 = 0x0000000D (emit data for write transfer) / 0x0000000E (emit PC & data for write transfer)
regards,
Joseph
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Reply
Offline
Joseph Yiu
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 23rd March 2012 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
Regarding DWTx_MASK:
0 = 1 byte
1 = 2 bytes
2 = 4 bytes
3 = 8 bytes
4 = 16 bytes , ..., etc
> DWT_COMPx = address of the variable to monitor (if several variables are contiguously defined, then here the lower address)
Please note that you need to have the address value being multiple of the compare address size. For example, if DWTx_MASK is set to 4 (16 bytes), then the address value should be multiple of 16.
You can use DWT to halt the processor when the PC match a certain value. In that case you need to set the Func field in DWTx_FUNC to 0x4.
But for monitoring variables using SWO you use function 1 - 3, and 12-15, with DWTx_COMP being the address value of the variable(s).
You can setup the DWTx_MASK to capture multiple variables in an address range, but by doing so you will need to emit the address values as well so that you can tell which variable of that address range is being accessed. Also, if you try to capture a large address range you can easily get buffer overflow in the trace system.
In most cases, since there are only maximum of 4 comparators in DWT, a debugger will limit the number of software variables that you can monitor to 4 to make it easier to handle.
If you want to generate a packet when a byte in 0x2000017C is written to, then
DWT_CTRL = 0x400003FE
DWT_COMP0 = 0x2000017C (address to monitor)
DWT_MASK0 = 0x0000000 (1 byte to monitor)
DWT_FUNCTION0 = 0x0000000D (emit data for write transfer) / 0x0000000E (emit PC & data for write transfer)
regards,
Joseph
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Children
No data