Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Research Collaboration and Enablement
DesignStart
Education Hub
Innovation
Open Source Software and Platforms
Forums
AI and ML forum
Architectures and Processors forum
Arm Development Platforms forum
Arm Development Studio forum
Arm Virtual Hardware forum
Automotive forum
Compilers and Libraries forum
Graphics, Gaming, and VR forum
High Performance Computing (HPC) forum
Infrastructure Solutions forum
Internet of Things (IoT) forum
Keil forum
Morello Forum
Operating Systems forum
SoC Design and Simulation forum
中文社区论区
Blogs
AI and ML blog
Announcements
Architectures and Processors blog
Automotive blog
Graphics, Gaming, and VR blog
High Performance Computing (HPC) blog
Infrastructure Solutions blog
Innovation blog
Internet of Things (IoT) blog
Operating Systems blog
Research Articles
SoC Design and Simulation blog
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
中文社区博客
Support
Arm Support Services
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Support forums
Arm Development Studio forum
RVDS 3.1 - Low Performance using node-locked license
Jump...
Cancel
Locked
Locked
Replies
4 replies
Subscribers
121 subscribers
Views
3039 views
Users
0 members are here
Options
Share
More actions
Cancel
Related
How was your experience today?
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion
RVDS 3.1 - Low Performance using node-locked license
Offline
Paulo Veronez
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 20th June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hello everybody.
[size=2]I'm working with a legacy application that is compiled with RVDS 3.1 build 1021. [/size]
We have an environment with a license server with 6 floating licenses and one client machine that also have a node-locked license.
I supposed that compiling with a node-locked license would give me better performance. But the compilation time is the triple of the time when I use the license server at the same machine.
[size=2]I believe that I have a unknown problem with this node-locked license. [/size]
[size=2]Am I wrong about the performance using node-locked license?[/size]
Is there a way to improve the performance using this node-locked license?
Offline
Paulo Veronez
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 24th June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
The network drives were disabled and the compilation time was reduced to 3 hours. However, the compilation time using the floating license is 2,5 hours.
I supposed that using a node-locked license would be faster than the floating license server. Am I wrong?
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Offline
Paulo Veronez
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 24th June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Thanks for your help.
I'm in contact with ARM's support team but they only have some guesses as you. I'll keep trying to find out what is going wrong.
In case of new clue please contact me.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Offline
Martin Weidmann
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 21st June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Is it a time limited license?
If so, try temporarily disabling any network drives mapped to drive letters. That worked for me once.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel
Offline
Martin Weidmann
over 9 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 24th June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
My experience is that node-locked licenses are faster. By how much depends on the network and the loading of the server. The only times I've had the node-locked be slower (for me) was with the mapped network drives. Which does seem to have helped in your case. I would guess (and it is a guess) that must be another similar thing slowing it down in your case. Have you tried ARM's support team?
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Cancel