<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.arm.com/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Reentrant function</title><link>https://community.arm.com/developer/tools-software/tools/f/keil-forum/42606/reentrant-function</link><description> Will compiler C51 support reentrant function ? 
Here, there are two cores 8051 and 80515(advance). Will the function defined as reentrant for both cores will be supported by C51 or not ? 
 
Thanks. </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Reentrant function</title><link>https://community.arm.com/thread/87291?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:35:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd9e70c8-6d3c-4c71-b136-2456382a7b5c:06c4425f-4ab2-4276-8664-61a5ecb749aa</guid><dc:creator>Andy Neil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Heck, it even has an index&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&amp;#39;t even need to go to the great trouble and inconvenience of using the index - the manuals are all available electronically and, therefore, have a &lt;b&gt;Search&lt;/b&gt; facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I dunno - youth of today...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Reentrant function</title><link>https://community.arm.com/thread/44321?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:26:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd9e70c8-6d3c-4c71-b136-2456382a7b5c:2623f8e9-a2b4-441f-bcba-ad4bbcab3122</guid><dc:creator>HansBernhard Broeker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh... Is there the slightest chance it will  ever again become common practice to teach people (programmers, at that) that there&amp;#39;s a &lt;b&gt;reason&lt;/b&gt; complicated tools like C51 come with a &lt;b&gt;manual&lt;/b&gt;, which might be intended for the express purpose of being &lt;b&gt;read&lt;/b&gt; to clarify such points?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heck, it even has an index, which just so happens to even have an entry for &amp;quot;reentrant&amp;quot;.  Oh the endless surprise!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>