<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.arm.com/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Ulink 2 or J-link?</title><link>https://community.arm.com/developer/tools-software/tools/f/keil-forum/40482/ulink-2-or-j-link</link><description> 
I can not decide whether to buy ULINK2 debugger from Keil or
J-Link from Segger, MDK-ARM supports both. Can you advise? 
 </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: Ulink 2 or J-link?</title><link>https://community.arm.com/thread/81729?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 06:55:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd9e70c8-6d3c-4c71-b136-2456382a7b5c:39b8b080-aed0-45ac-a0a5-60accdbf95a5</guid><dc:creator>Frank Foyl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Actually, I find J-Link is faster even when downloading the
program,&lt;br /&gt;
at least when you use the J-Link Flash loader.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
See&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://segger.com/jlink-flash-download.html"&gt;segger.com/jlink-flash-download.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
Also, you have the option to use an unlimited number of
breakpoints in flash memory,&lt;br /&gt;
which is especially important if you are using a device with few
breakpoints.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
See&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://segger.com/jlink-unlimited-flash-breakpoints.html"&gt;segger.com/jlink-unlimited-flash-breakpoints.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Ulink 2 or J-link?</title><link>https://community.arm.com/thread/62596?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:48:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd9e70c8-6d3c-4c71-b136-2456382a7b5c:397eda35-53a8-46b9-9bb4-15820ba81809</guid><dc:creator>Jupp Kaltofen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I own both of them. If you decide to work exlusive with KEIL
&amp;micro;Vision, you should pay for an&lt;br /&gt;
ULINK2. ULINK2 is supported only by Keil &amp;micro;Vision - &lt;b&gt;none
other&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
If you unsure working exclusice with the Keil Ide, you should decide
you for Seggers J-LINK, that&lt;br /&gt;
got a wide support of IDE&amp;#39;s that are available now. I had noticed,
that the ULINK2 are faster in Uploading and upload&lt;br /&gt;
and debugging and feels closer integrated in &amp;micro;Vision
environement as any other and does not need any driver
installation&lt;br /&gt;
or updates of Windows usb drivers because they use the HID
drivers.&lt;br /&gt;
The J-LINK is more flexible and supports a wide range of Chips and is
not brand specific.The support of the from Segger is awesome&lt;br /&gt;
and supported by every well known IDE - even LINUX, MAC-OS10 or
Windows. The J-LINK is upgradable for a bunch of debuggers&lt;br /&gt;
and needs just a license code. I hope this helps you to find a
decision for your purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
I don&amp;#39;t want to fix me on Keil, so i purchaised both of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Ulink 2 or J-link?</title><link>https://community.arm.com/thread/62592?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 04:53:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd9e70c8-6d3c-4c71-b136-2456382a7b5c:09304dc1-9931-4774-b988-b2332a622398</guid><dc:creator>VIKTOR BUCHRT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
With J-LINK you can use Keil tools and IAR tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>