greetings ,,,, how long will this delay go
int delay ( int start , int end ) { int counting;
counting = start;
while ( counting < end ) ++ counting ;
return 7 ; }
here is the result we see
So, you're not alone in your clueless quest?
hey......nice code chum.......
Oh, yeah.
"delay ( 1 , 1000 ) is 97S"
Assuming that the 97S is meant to mean seconds, then can we conclude that the processor is an abacus and the clock frequency (finger frequency ?) is quite high.
"ive run the code and here is the result we see
delay ( 1 , 1000 ) is 97S"
You haven't said what compiler options you used;
You haven't said what processor you used;
You haven't said what clock frequency you used;
97S = 97 siemens; which is a measure of conductance
en.wikipedia.org/.../Siemens_(unit)
ive run the code and here is the result we see
delay ( 1 , 1000 ) is 97S delay ( 1 , 10000 ) is 164S delay ( 1000 , 2000 ) is 103S delay ( 1 , 60000 ) is 4S delay ( 0 , 100000) is 22S
Think about what time of year it is... school has just started and the first problem sets will be do soon
delays in 'C' are by definition undefined.
Erik
See: www.8052.com/.../162556
what is this, broken code day? why not start counting from 0 to down to 0? what about effects of compiler optimization? this does not even compile! and why returning 7 seems to make any sense? lucky number?
View all questions in Keil forum