<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.arm.com/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A51 Source Code Containing MPL</title><link>https://community.arm.com/developer/tools-software/tools/f/keil-forum/31546/a51-source-code-containing-mpl</link><description> Hi, I am currently running Nohau EMUL51-PC emulator with Seahau Software (Version 4.0422A). All the programming modules were written previously in the 8051 assembly language. My problem comes after I added a few macros to the code using Macro Processing</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: A51 Source Code Containing MPL</title><link>https://community.arm.com/thread/38989?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2002 19:07:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd9e70c8-6d3c-4c71-b136-2456382a7b5c:6aa410e7-e7a1-4a0e-8232-572ee7a7612f</guid><dc:creator>Jon Ward</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In the original Intel A51 Assembler, the line number references between macros and the object code did not exist.  In other words, there was no way to get from the code generated by a macro back to the macro (so that you single-step thru the MACRO source) rather than the code generated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We recently added this feature (in 6.23).  There are a few things you must know.  They are all outlined in the following knowledgebase article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.keil.com/support/docs/2202.htm"&gt;http://www.keil.com/support/docs/2202.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Jon&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: A51 Source Code Containing MPL</title><link>https://community.arm.com/thread/38984?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:37:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd9e70c8-6d3c-4c71-b136-2456382a7b5c:f169fb55-14dc-48ce-8a3c-35058df0e3df</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Neil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;they suggested me to contact Keil first&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is, of course, the &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; answer!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously though, if you have support then you &lt;b&gt;should&lt;/b&gt; direct support questions to the appropriate support address - see &lt;a href="http://www.keil.com/support/email.htm"&gt;http://www.keil.com/support/email.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it shouldn&amp;#39;t hurt to see what other opinions/experience can be elicited &lt;i&gt;via&lt;/i&gt; this forum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>