<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.arm.com/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>C161, flash, uVision1, uVision2</title><link>https://community.arm.com/developer/tools-software/tools/f/keil-forum/14653/c161-flash-uvision1-uvision2</link><description> C161O, AMD AM29F002(N)BB 256K x 8 flash from 0x0 to 0x3FFFF, Cypress 128K RAM from 0x80000 to 0x9FFFF. 8-bit, non-mux bus at 16 MHz. 
 
The simplest program erases the sector at 0x8000, writes to it, then goes into a loop. When built under uVision 1</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>RE: C161, flash, uVision1, uVision2</title><link>https://community.arm.com/thread/38514?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:34:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd9e70c8-6d3c-4c71-b136-2456382a7b5c:8a7ddd47-8b7b-4fcd-9b59-0690bb7de7b2</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Neil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Presumably, in the switch from UV1 to UV2, you also have different versions of the underlying tools? (compiler, assembler, linker, &lt;i&gt;etc&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you tried compiling from the command line, to see if you can isolate the change to either uVision or the tools?&lt;br /&gt;
I think it should be possible to get UV2 to use the old tools by editing TOOLS.INI? (There was a thread on this recently)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The listing files show the command-line options used - have you checked that UV2 is using a sensible/appropriate set of options?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>