Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Arm Research
DesignStart
Education Hub
Graphics and Gaming
High Performance Computing
Innovation
Multimedia
Open Source Software and Platforms
Physical
Processors
Security
System
Software Tools
TrustZone for Armv8-M
中文社区
Blog
Announcements
Artificial Intelligence
Automotive
Healthcare
HPC
Infrastructure
Innovation
Internet of Things
Machine Learning
Mobile
Smart Homes
Wearables
Forums
All developer forums
IP Product forums
Tool & Software forums
Support
Open a support case
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Developer Community
Tools and Software
Software Tools
Jump...
Cancel
Software Tools
Arm Development Studio forum
What to do upon detection of Error
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
Forums
Videos & Files
Help
Jump...
Cancel
New
Replies
2 replies
Subscribers
126 subscribers
Views
1494 views
Users
0 members are here
Related
What to do upon detection of Error
Offline
Muhammad Ahsan
over 7 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 29th July 2011 at http://forums.arm.com
Hi,
I have implemented a couple of tests for Cortex-M3. These tests include calculation of CRC checksum over selected flash area, verification of Clock using Clock Supervisor and verification of occurance of Interrupts. the tests are working perfectly but I am not sure what to do, in case CRC checksum is wrong, or any of the other mentioned tests do not meet the desired results.
One option is to implement endless loop, waiting for watchdog to hit, is it meaningful? any other ideas would be highly appreciated.
All these tests are part of self test library that has to be integrated with the end user application. Is it make sense to leave it to the user to define whatever he thinks suitable in case of failure of component?
Looking for some quick response!
Regards,
Offline
Mahesh
over 7 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 24th August 2011 at
http://forums.arm.com
I concur with ttfn , dependent on the type of verification test you could decide to either proceed with the next step or revalidate that test. Its entirely a system level decision. Perhaps if you had more specifics then we could provide better definitions for what your tests are really checking for?
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Offline
Martin Weidmann
over 7 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 2nd August 2011 at
http://forums.arm.com
There isn't really a set answer. The question you should ask yourself is what would a failure mean, and what would be must useful/safest to do.
For example, a CRC check might imply memory corruption. Memory corruption would mean you could not rely on code executing correctly. Therefore it might be best not to even attempt running it. What would be helpful? Error code? Error light? Error buzz?
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
More questions in this forum
By title
By date
By reply count
By view count
By most asked
By votes
By quality
Descending
Ascending
All recent questions
Unread questions
Questions you've participated in
Questions you've asked
Unanswered questions
Answered questions
Questions with suggested answers
Questions with no replies
Not Answered
Forum FAQs
0
ARM Community
2518
views
0
replies
Started
1 month ago
by
Annie Cracknell
Not Answered
Use Arm DS5 streamline performance analyzer on TX2
0
1048
views
4
replies
Latest
2 days ago
by
ShirB
Not Answered
index are changing with the voltage apply to the adc
0
214
views
0
replies
Started
2 days ago
by
Vishal_Patel
Not Answered
Extended asm alternative for Arm Compiler 5 (memory barriers)
0
Memory Management Unit (MMU)
Arm Assembly Language (ASM)
Arm Compiler 5
221
views
0
replies
Started
5 days ago
by
StoneCold
Not Answered
Problem with arm_cmplx_mag_f32()
0
881
views
2
replies
Latest
10 days ago
by
Vishal_Patel
>
View all questions in Arm Development Studio forum