Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Arm Research
DesignStart
Education Hub
Graphics and Gaming
High Performance Computing
Innovation
Multimedia
Open Source Software and Platforms
Physical
Processors
Security
System
Software Tools
TrustZone for Armv8-M
中文社区
Blog
Announcements
Artificial Intelligence
Automotive
Healthcare
HPC
Infrastructure
Innovation
Internet of Things
Machine Learning
Mobile
Smart Homes
Wearables
Forums
All developer forums
IP Product forums
Tool & Software forums
Support
Open a support case
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
Community Help
More
Cancel
Developer Community
Tools and Software
Software Tools
Jump...
Cancel
Software Tools
Arm Development Studio forum
RVDS 3.1 - Low Performance using node-locked license
Tools, Software and IDEs blog
Forums
Videos & Files
Help
Jump...
Cancel
New
Replies
4 replies
Subscribers
126 subscribers
Views
2125 views
Users
0 members are here
Related
RVDS 3.1 - Low Performance using node-locked license
Offline
Paulo Veronez
over 7 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 20th June 2013 at http://forums.arm.com
Hello everybody.
[size=2]I'm working with a legacy application that is compiled with RVDS 3.1 build 1021. [/size]
We have an environment with a license server with 6 floating licenses and one client machine that also have a node-locked license.
I supposed that compiling with a node-locked license would give me better performance. But the compilation time is the triple of the time when I use the license server at the same machine.
[size=2]I believe that I have a unknown problem with this node-locked license. [/size]
[size=2]Am I wrong about the performance using node-locked license?[/size]
Is there a way to improve the performance using this node-locked license?
Offline
Paulo Veronez
over 7 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 24th June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
The network drives were disabled and the compilation time was reduced to 3 hours. However, the compilation time using the floating license is 2,5 hours.
I supposed that using a node-locked license would be faster than the floating license server. Am I wrong?
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Offline
Paulo Veronez
over 7 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 24th June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Thanks for your help.
I'm in contact with ARM's support team but they only have some guesses as you. I'll keep trying to find out what is going wrong.
In case of new clue please contact me.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Offline
Martin Weidmann
over 7 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 21st June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
Is it a time limited license?
If so, try temporarily disabling any network drives mapped to drive letters. That worked for me once.
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
Offline
Martin Weidmann
over 7 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 24th June 2013 at
http://forums.arm.com
My experience is that node-locked licenses are faster. By how much depends on the network and the loading of the server. The only times I've had the node-locked be slower (for me) was with the mapped network drives. Which does seem to have helped in your case. I would guess (and it is a guess) that must be another similar thing slowing it down in your case. Have you tried ARM's support team?
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Cancel
More questions in this forum
By title
By date
By reply count
By view count
By most asked
By votes
By quality
Descending
Ascending
All recent questions
Unread questions
Questions you've participated in
Questions you've asked
Unanswered questions
Answered questions
Questions with suggested answers
Questions with no replies
Suggested Answer
How to view SFRs in DS during debugging?
0
1935
views
1
reply
Latest
1 month ago
by
Ronan Synnott
Answered
Dual-core debugging in DS
0
4825
views
2
replies
Latest
1 month ago
by
Ivan Savvateev
Answered
Failure to get an evaluation license with error Unable to execute API call /api/v1/connect
0
5741
views
3
replies
Latest
1 month ago
by
Tim Holt
Suggested Answer
DS52020.0 connection to Musca-A/B boards not working
0
Arm Development Studio
Musca-A
6779
views
4
replies
Latest
1 month ago
by
Daniel Oliveira
Suggested Answer
Positioning a function in a Position Independent Executable for ARMV8
0
7349
views
3
replies
Latest
2 months ago
by
Stephen Theobald
<
>
View all questions in Arm Development Studio forum